English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

30 answers

IT'S REALLY TOUGH TO TOP THE HOSTAGE ABANDONER!

2007-05-03 13:34:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Let's see, under Jimmy we had gas shortages, long lines at the gas pumps, 55mph speed limits, runaway inflation, 20% rate mortgages, and a hostage situation that was only resolved after America replaced him with a Republican president. Jimmy was the last democrat to win office by more than half (50.1%) and he mucked things up so badly in 4 short years that voters kicked him out the first chance they got.
I hope not, but I expect the current crop of democrat contenders would try.

2007-05-03 20:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by T D 5 · 1 1

First -- "more worse"??? Learn about superlatives Bozo

Second -- sure Herbert Hoover, Warren G Harding, Calvin Coolidge, U.S. Grant, Richard Nixon, and of course, George Wrong-way Bush

All of whom just happen to be Republicans

2007-05-03 20:37:36 · answer #3 · answered by send_it_to_zoom 4 · 0 1

i don't think so...Carter, after reading my history, was pretty terrible...he is the main cause of terrorist sponsoring state of Iran...
Jimmy Carter, elected during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and (1) believing Americans had an inordinate fear of communism, (2) lifted U.S. citizens' travel bans to Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia and (3) pardoned draft evaders.

President Carter (4) also stopped B-1 bomber production, (5) gave away our strategically located Panama Canal and (6) made human rights the central focus of his foreign policy.

That led Carter, a Democrat, (7) to make a monumental miscalculation and withdraw U.S. support for our long-standing Mideast military ally, the Shah of Iran. (8) Carter simply didn't like the Shah's alleged mistreatment of imprisoned Soviet spies.

The Soviets, (9) with close military ties to Iraq, a 1,500-mile border with Iran and eyes on Afghanistan, aggressively tried to encircle, infiltrate, subvert and overthrow Iran's government for its oil deposits and warm-water ports several times after Russian troops attempted to stay there at the end of WWII. These were all communist threats to Iran that Carter never understood.

Carter (10) thought Ayatollah Khomeini, a Muslim exile in Paris, would make a fairer Iranian leader than the Shah because he was a religious man. (11) With U.S. support withdrawn, the Shah was overthrown, and (12) the ayatollah returned and promptly proclaimed Iran an Islamic nation. (13) Executions followed. Palestinian hit men were hired to secretly eliminate the opposition so the religious mullahs couldn't be blamed.

Iran's ayatollah (14) then introduces the idea of suicide bombers to the Palestine Liberation Organization and paid $35,000 to PLO families whose young people were brainwashed to attack and kill as many Israeli citizens as possible by blowing themselves up. This inhumane menace has grown unchallenged.

The ayatollah (15) next created and financed with Iran's oil wealth Hezbollah, a terrorist organization that later bombed our barracks in Beirut, killing 241 Marines and sailors. With Iran's encouragement this summer, (16) Hezbollah attacked Israel and started a war that damaged Lebanon and (17) diverted the world's attention from Iran's nuclear bomb program.

In November 1979, Iranians, including (18) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, their current puppet president who was elected in an unfree, rigged election in which opponents were intimidated into not running, (19) stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held 52 U.S. personnel hostage for 444 days.

Carter, after nearly six months, (20) belatedly attempted a poorly executed rescue with only six Navy helicopters (three were lost or disabled in sandstorms) and Air Force planes with Delta Force commandos. The mission was aborted, but foul-ups on the ground resulted in a loss of eight aircraft, five airman and three Marines. The bungled plan was never put down on paper for the Joint Chiefs to evaluate. There were practice sessions, but no full dress rehearsal, and pilots weren't allowed to meet with their weather forecasters because someone in authority worried about security.

2007-05-03 20:36:22 · answer #4 · answered by turntable 6 · 6 1

While he is clearly the worst in my lifetime, it is possible for a president to be worse. Hillary Clinton would be MUCH worse.

2007-05-03 21:02:59 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

In theory yes.... Just about any thing, no matter how unlikely, could happen. Like one could win the Power Ball 10 times in a row for instance.

2007-05-03 20:41:43 · answer #6 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0 2

it is funny how this guy has answered like 4000 quistions and only 150 ppl chose him best answer lol what a loser

2007-05-04 14:18:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary Clinton during PMS?

2007-05-03 20:33:48 · answer #8 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 5 2

On what planet have you lived since 2001? The current one is not even human, it's a demented monkey.

2007-05-03 21:06:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Well...lets see...how many Servicemen lost their lives in a civil war in the Islamic region during Carter's term????...

2007-05-03 20:40:27 · answer #10 · answered by navymom 5 · 1 4

Carter was a weenie,inbred,hillybilly defeat-o-crat. The absolute worst!

2007-05-03 20:33:57 · answer #11 · answered by madame mao 1 · 6 3

fedest.com, questions and answers