2007-05-03 13:17:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I thought success was landing a training plane on a aircraft carrier.
Go Team Bush Go
2007-05-03 13:20:17 · answer #1 · answered by ShortBus43 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does that mean the definition of "failure" has also changed? Yeah, I'm rolling my eyes on this one. The definition of "success" is likely still the same in the latest dictionaries, and what some may not consider "success," others might.
Are you aware that men's tank tops came back in style not too long ago (unsure if they are still in style)? Yeah, this is stuff for a beauty parlor conversation, not for anyone with any reasonable amount of intelligence.
2007-05-03 20:26:18 · answer #2 · answered by paypalcurious 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iraq can stand on it's own 3 feet, without having to hold our hand, I would call that a success. It's like preventing crime in the US, a never ending job.
2007-05-03 20:23:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, something about liveable condition I think. There are many places in this country that dont meet the criteria. Katrina victims can testify on this better than I.
2007-05-03 20:56:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes... you are 2 or 3 days behind in the talking points.
2007-05-03 20:21:10 · answer #5 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mine hasn't. It's the progressive realization of a worthwhile goal. I don't care what anyone else thinks it is.
2007-05-03 20:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whaaaaat? Now it is derived from sucker?
Oh, yes! go team Bush,go
2007-05-03 20:26:02 · answer #7 · answered by AliBaba 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And the amazingpart--its still just as vague and uninformative as it was before!
2007-05-03 20:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
success = the failure to failure
2007-05-03 20:21:21 · answer #9 · answered by casey 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋