Let says that WWE was around only 5 years like TNA. WWE have no big superstars and have no Wrestlemania. All the big superstars was in TNA now and WWE have less know wrestlers.
WWE show was only for an hour and TNA show was on 2 hours. WWE pay-per-view was on for 3 hours and TNA pay-per-view was on for 4 hours.
TNA has the best storyline and WWE has an ok stroyline. TNA have a better website than WWE website.
Would WWE fans stay and watch WWE with less know wrestlers or would they watch the big superstar on TNA.
There is No Mr. MaMahon at WWE or anyelse.
WWE has one video game and TNA has a lot of video games.
TNA was on a better TV channel than WWE.
2007-05-03 11:03:16 · 12 answers · asked by The Fallen Angel 6 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Well I would watch TNA in this case because I like to watch wrestlers who can wrestle. But if TNA had big name superstars who can't wrestle, like Batista, and the WWE still had their mid-card great superstars like Jeff Hardy and Chris Benoit, then I would still watch the WWE. If TNA was on a regular cable channel (1-20 is all I have) then I might watch it, but the WWE is what I usually watch because I get all of the shows for free online on a website. But overall, if I could, I'd probably try to watch both shows.
2007-05-03 11:10:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The truth is this is impossible for even an hypothetical situation. As long as Vince runs WWE then it will be on top. He is the one that made it what it is and it will die with him too. His children don't have the ability to run the company like he has. If you take everything that built WWE like Vince Wrestlemania, the wrestlers, then I am sure another program would come and replace it. Those thing are WWE.
So basicall what I guess you are asking is that if this was opposite day and everything that is true all of a sudden became not true then would TNA be better then WWE. And the answer then is true.
2007-05-03 11:13:54 · answer #2 · answered by The_Bluesman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that happened, steroid abusing faggots who can't wrestle (John Cena, Batista), wouldn't be paid 1,000,000$ a year to suck. Instead, maybe they'd have decent wrestlers. I still think TNA Is the better industry, not in sales, but in talent. I actually wouldn't mind WWE if they would just stop shoving retards like Cena down our throats.
Anyways, I think TNA would handle the success better.
2007-05-03 11:10:29 · answer #3 · answered by Alex V 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vinnie Mac would make the fatal mistake of hiring Vince Russo again and the the WWE would get run into the ground faster than WCW.
2007-05-03 11:30:28 · answer #4 · answered by FatBoy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE would prob have to improve their product in order to do so, when TNA gets a 2hr weekly show eventually and gets bigger, trust me the matches will get worse and everything!!!!
2007-05-03 11:54:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA isn't the 1st employer to apply a hoop extra effective than 4 factors. jewelry like that have been utilized in Mexico for years. it works for cruiserweights and severe flyers, yet no longer plenty heavyweights
2016-12-10 18:34:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd watch WWE because the six-sided ring is weird.
2007-05-03 11:08:30 · answer #7 · answered by «G6260» 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well everyone would watch TNA but they will never be as succsesful as wwe.
2007-05-03 11:08:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would quit watchn wwe but that wont happen
2007-05-03 11:06:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that would suck....
Good it aint Happening!
2007-05-03 11:58:23 · answer #10 · answered by LarbradorianGuy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋