isn't it time to change our judiciary to jury system?

Answer 1

Judiciary is adorned by learn ed judges who have tremendous accountability.Jury has a fringe role in suggesting a few things based on common understanding. In some countries they are randomly selected. Some have no idea of the intricacies of the legal system. Jury is just a feather on a judicial cap. You cannot lean on slender reed for such vital decisions that involve life, property and prestige.

Answer 2

I assume you are from India. In India, I believe the jury system would be the worst thing possible, creating rampant scope for corruption. As though we do not have enough corruption already. Most judges, atleast in metros where the press keeps an eagle eye, are not corrupt, whereas it would be not too difficult to corrupt individual jurors. Not to mention inherent bias of individual jurors such as on caste, community lines etc. May we never have a jury system in India.

Answer 3

We have had a jury system since the formation of the country.

Or are you talking about some place other than the United States?

Answer 4

I don't think so! Members who sit in jury are ordinary people from all walk of life who may or may not be having knowledge of law & legal system, in criminal justice the basic requirement is of the evidence brought on the record & circumstances leading to the offence by the accused, which lawyers & judges with proper legal knowledge & experience can apply to the particular case. What a novice sitting in the jury will not be able to construe these in a case as legal experts do & will be going by the sentiments which usually news media is exploiting nowadays. We in the legal system have to follow a particular partner to study & construe any case to reach a judicious result which an ordinary citizen will not be able to do. I doubt very much if jury system which was once followed in the Indian judicial system but now forgone will be of any help in proper judicial results rather it can confuse the whole judicial system with superficial considerations.

Answer 5

The Judiciary device elect no longer get replaced. what's needed is the peoples lively participation. Why are the police selection to report a grievance? because of the fact they are being pressed against the wall via the sheer style of proceedings of the previous which elect no longer proceed to take report area. enable me clarify! *while a guy or woman has a greviance he/she promptly is going to the police station to hotel a grievance case in point a case of lost bag/handbag, yet while an identical guy or woman locate it they do no longer experience it had to tell the police? with the end result the police data are clogged with proceedings which neednt be there interior the 1st place. This motives the genuine proceedings to be lost interior the coolest purchase of no longer worth proceedings. an identical is the case with courts. Do your due and issues will artwork. that's constantly greater effectual to set already present issues suited fairly than getting in for some thing new and distinctive completely.

Answer 6

We had earlier but because it is non productive we got it abolished. Don't get away the jury system in USA. It is big farce and becoming non productive.

Answer 7

No, i feel it will give more scope for corruption

Answer 8

No