here is the story-
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/judge-sues-cleaner-for-65-million-over/20070503071409990001?ncid=NWS0001000000
65 million for a pair of pants that they gave back to him?? dont people have any morals??
2007-05-03 09:14:42 · 28 answers · asked by shepp959 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
this world aint coming, its GOING to HELL. not alot of people know this but the government is keepin a big big secret. That explains the weird climate here in california. Everyone B PRepareD!
2007-05-03 09:20:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. I would not spend 65 million on a pair of pants
2007-05-03 16:17:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's absolutely crazy!! He's a judge? Isn't he rich to begin with? Why go for people who have a lot less than him? For God's sake, they even found the pants... What's the point?
2007-05-03 16:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by Miss T 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it was stupid to allow him to get that money but It doesnt matter even if he won they dont have 65 million dollars to pay him it could be for 100,000,000,000,000,000 but he wont see a fraction of it because they dont have it it was still wrong of him to do this to hard working americans
2007-05-03 16:26:38 · answer #4 · answered by d h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Makes perfect sense that this would occur, considering judges are the problem in the first place.
2007-05-03 16:20:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
gah thats just horrible. That judge just wants to get even richer than he already is and since he has"power" than he will probably win, sad but true.. i feel so sorry for those poor cleaners!!!!
2007-05-03 16:23:36 · answer #6 · answered by LOST_fanatic:)! 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's scary that this guy is an appointed judge. Perhaps they should undergo psychiatric evaluations before they're appointment is final. Those poor people.
2007-05-03 16:27:19 · answer #7 · answered by Firespider 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And here is somebody representing the "law and morals". Shame on him! What an embarrassment!
2007-05-03 16:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's terrible.
Yes, it appears the judge is lacking in the ethics department.
Ironic, isn't it?
2007-05-03 16:21:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So sad, I hope that guy suffers a serious case of Karma
2007-05-03 16:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋