Please share your sources or numbers. If you can't give sources or numbers, please don't answer!
2007-05-03 08:20:35 · 6 answers · asked by sww_35 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
100%. It either was a natural occurrence or someone made it occur. I have not read any explanations of the Big Bang that postulate that someone made it happen. The Catholic Church accepted the Big Bang explanation in 1951.
Here is a great quote:
"According to the big bang theory, the universe began by expanding from an infinitesimal volume with extremely high density and temperature. The universe was initially significantly smaller than even a pore on your skin. With the big bang, the fabric of space itself began expanding like the surface of an inflating balloon – matter simply rode along the stretching space like dust on the balloon's surface. The big bang is not like an explosion of matter in otherwise empty space; rather, space itself began with the big bang and carried matter with it as it expanded. Physicists think that even time began with the big bang. Today, just about every scientist believes in the big bang model. The evidence is overwhelming enough that in 1951, the Catholic Church officially pronounced the big bang model to be in accordance with the Bible."
2007-05-03 10:30:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is impossible to answer in the format requested. Look at it this way: the possiblity that is was a natural occurence is equal to 1-the possibility that it was not a natural occurence. If it was not a natural occurence, that means it was man-made. Since we have a reasonable belief that humans did not create the universe and all the data says that humans did not exist at that time, that probability is zero. So the 'scientific approximation' = 1.00. But, your question is more pseudoscience babel than science.
2007-05-03 08:56:53 · answer #2 · answered by squeezie_1999 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This isn't a well-stated problem. The answer is obviously 100% unless you have some unusual definition of natural. Every phenomenon we have ever observed (including the remnants of the early universe) is natural.
2007-05-03 09:08:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a 50/50, either it was a natural occurrence, or it wasn't. We can't put a possibility on something that can't be tested. Therefore, we can conceptualize it as either happened or didn't.
2007-05-03 08:24:13 · answer #4 · answered by jcann17 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Huh? 100%
What else could it be? An un-natural occurance?
2007-05-03 08:25:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am going with.....100%
2007-05-03 08:34:02 · answer #6 · answered by Captain Algae 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋