English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

SL players wanted only Good-Fair Final which they deprived of ,-bad umpiring- With Russel arnold & Mahela jayawardana was given most Ridiculous outs.

Dont you still realised there are 2 set of rules for cricket Icc umpires and ferres and officials
1.) for Asian teams specially & westindies (color)
2.)the other one is for Australia,N.zealand,England,S.africa

Everybody realises by now this Cup as well as
Semi final with Newzealand and final with Asutralia
staged drama to Eliminate Srilanka of
being worthy Champions of the 2007 Cup.

4 clear not outs given against sri alnkan batsmen.
who likes to jump -conclution,- that they are not
intentional--( Bias/ not)

2007-05-03 06:23:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

12 answers

why most fans here never even think about
retaliating these parcial verdicts by umpires

But one thing is clear
if thesebad umpiring had happened to Australia and
by that Sri Lanka won the cup
all these Noble non Australian(originally)
fans would have put millions and zillions of questions .
loads of bad mouthing mighthave occured.
now still OZ wins by unfair means
still these so called unbias fans
use everything possible to stop Srilankan complaints

2007-05-04 05:11:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

dude what are you talking about? almost ever player in international cricket has been given out when not out at some time or another Sri Lanka is no different after all the umpires are human beings. Sri lanka lost to the best team in the world the Australians outplayed them no conspiracy in that.

2007-05-03 20:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It is a pity that people are coming out with lot of excusesand coverups for the loss of Sri Lanka in the final without realising the fact that Sri Lankan Bowlers were main culprits for the loss of Sri Lanka in the final. Did anybody prevent Sri Lankan Bowlers bowling to their known potential and contain the Australian Opening Batsmen instead of allowing Australia to pile up such a huge total. When even Sri Lankan Captain appreciated the fact that Australia played better cricket, I dont understand why Sri Lankan supports cannot digest the fact.

2007-05-03 13:35:29 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 2

Jayawardene was really great to magnanimously accept defeat. Why you are still complaining.What prevented Fernando from taking the catch offered by Gilchrist.Gilchrist who was a bit cautious till then realised that it was his day and took the game away from SriLanka.

2007-05-04 05:57:15 · answer #4 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0 0

it is illegal by cricket law....
Law 3 (6) (c) (i) specifically prohibits a player from using equipment other than that permitted. And nowhere in cricket’s 42 laws is there a mention of a squash ball as a permitted item.

some s-------s say if it illegal why srilankan cricket board never lodged acomplaint.......
what the heck.....
would icc support that
this so called immparcia foru guys never even allow to raise a suspition about Gilchrist
this cercumstance might have earged Lanka Cricket bord not to complain
the result is the same
like bucknor
Dhar, Rudicortson
and socalled no 1 australian umpire
everybody worship to australia
all are bribed by Australia
all are submissive to australia
what a pity, how low can these oz supporters can get
they expect srilankan supporters to shut their mouth
is it for real,
um... they expect sri lanakn supporters to worship
them (Oz)too
in your dreams,,,,,

2007-05-04 00:45:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

This is old news now
sri lanks bowlers could not contain the aussie batsmen resulting in a target too high for them to catch.
Why cant you people just face facts your team did not perform well on that day.

2007-05-03 17:40:09 · answer #6 · answered by tuppenybitz 7 · 0 1

What a load of #@$&! Did you even stop to think that the two umpires in the match were from the countries that are supposedly getting shafted! Aleem Dar (PAK), Steve Bucknor (WI) are two of the best in the World and the fact that you think that they would deliberately allow the Aussie to win is ludicrous! Cop it on the chin mate and stop whining!

2007-05-03 21:07:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

we see really some sort of under cutting went on in semi final & final
that was the most obvious one
thank you for asking about it

2007-05-09 14:51:41 · answer #8 · answered by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 · 0 0

yes

2007-05-05 02:30:53 · answer #9 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

don't most excuses.... the aussies were the best team there,, people that make excuses are 'bad sports'

2007-05-03 19:38:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers