Why are libs so upset about Condi meeting with the Syrians when Nancy Pelosi met with them some time ago?

Question

Isn't that just a wee bit hypocritical?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aj_f8hxnUfoYFtXyk7nBkqPY7BR.?qid=20070503094103AAZzd4Z

There are a lot of angry liberals on here....my job is done. LOL!!!!

Answer 1

I hope you realize by now that your question is completely silly.

The question you referenced was a sarcastic one.

Answer 2

Because when NANCY met with them, it was to find a peaceful solution to the problems of the ME.
When CONDI met with them, it was to advance the New World Order agenda of the neocons oil-industrial-Teutonic Knights Da Vinci Code conspiracy to do something rotten that will ultimately make Haliburton a lot of money.

Doesn't matter that NANCY has no standing and is pursuing an agenda contrary to the official policy of the US, or that CONDI is carrying the official policy of the US...
...it just doesn't matter to LIBS.

Answer 3

well, troll, I'm assuming you were around when Nancy went and visited with them and saw how the Bush supporters reacted to that didn't you? that is the point that many liberals are trying to make.. the "why aren't they upset about this" type of thing.. very few at all are upset with Condi for going.. again.. they are upset with the hypocrisy that so many people have shown against them for approving of Nancy going. at a guess I would say you are probably one of these such people that are a hypocrite who supports Condi but not Nancy going... but such is life.

Answer 4

Austingirl, I would like to see your sources indicating that numbers of Syrian fighters has declined. I doubt you could prove it, since that would be an Intelligence function, and even the Syrians couldn't tell you for certain whether there has been a drop in insurgents crossing the border.

Instead, it sounds like wishful propaganda based on your desire to believe that what Pelosi did actually led to anything. It didn't.

I won't even comment on the question...enough Liberals are "outraged" already... too funny

Answer 5

I am definitely NOT upset, Condi should have gone a long time ago.
Next stop Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Russia, China...........

Answer 6

What "libs" have said they are "upset" about it? Who said what exactly? I'm reading the AP article on it with no "lib" politician as you call it made any criticism. This is a something the Sec of State should have been doing all along.

Before putting up straw man arguments, give some actual facts I can comment on.

Answer 7

It's sarcasm, not hypocrisy. If anyone is being hypocritical it's the Bush administration. They've said for a long time that they wouldn't negotiate with Syria and criticized Pelosi for meeting with them.

Answer 8

What I find ironic about it all is that there has been a decrease in Syrian fighters in Iraq since Pelosi's visit...I suppose the Bushies are attempting to take credit.

I'm actually glad that the lines of communication are open, I just think it's funny that a Dem. had to tell you how foreign policy is supposed to work. With that aside, what's good for America is good for me.

Answer 9

Wow you are getting the picture. They or rather we could care less. We are making fun of how stupid your Nancy Pelosi posts were... Libs unlike you cons actually understand why she is doing so.

Answer 10

How do we know that that person isn't an alter ego of yourself, posting conflicting messages?

hmmm.

I'm happy that the administration is finally heeding the advice of others regarding international cooperation.

Answer 11

Here's a clue...that was a joke, making fun of the way Republicans always call Democrats traitors.