Does President Bush Use An Addicts Logic When Making Decisions?

Question

he seems very unwilling to accept responsibility for his mistakes, ignores reality and is always seeking to blame someone else.

Is this the classic thinking pattern of an alcoholic?

have a look at tear's response:
'lets talk about hillary...'
is that the typical response of a bush supporter when faced with uncomfortable facts?

nice try jason - but our esteemed president is an admitted reformed alcoholic - my question is about him and his thinking patters.
again, why do cons with to make everything about every issue about liberals?
if you like, you can ask your questions - but this question is about president bush's thought process.

sunshine, the victims of hurricane katrina, who drowned FIVE days after the hurricane might disagree with how bush views reality.
so might the 3,000+ american soldiers and 600,000+ dead iraqi civilians.

Answer 1

It's the Republican way - Lie, deny, and blame others.

Answer 2

I don't know if Bush really stopped drinking after he supposedly quit the bottle in 1986(just about the time he was getting out of the oil business. But as far as I am concerned, George W Bush has always accepted responsibilty for his actions. His predecessor was of a different stripe. "I did not have sex with that woman". I wonder what Monica thought when he said that under oath. Bill Clinton was also on record as saying that he did not smoke because he did not inhale. Bill Clinton was also a drug user and the White House was essentially a crack house because of drug use by Clinton staffers. I guess you consider hitting the bottle worse than snorting the white stuff up your proboscis. One has to wonder whether it was the Big Macs or the heroin that put Bill in the hospital for a heart attack. And speaking of not accepting responsibility, how many times did American facilities get attacked while Clinton essentially did nothing.

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0335.htm

Answer 3

I find it interesting you say typical response when folks bring op Hillary. Yet you spit out crap with no fact, no logic, no supporting documentation, detailed reasons, or clinical discussion or research, yet you make the diagnosis that the President acts like a drunk????? Who is the one who comes accross narrow minded and simple. That is you my friend...

By the way, thank you for taking a shot at the "Recovery Community" your liberals have fought so hard to endorse. So it's OK to Recover from addiction or alcoholism, but we are gonna hold it against you for ever... A little simple minded and pretty much against any enlightened thought process...
As one in recovery myself for many years, I assure you that I and my friends take responsibility for ALL our actions, as opposed to hate based BLAMING and uneducated diatribe that you appear to spew.
We to the best of our ability atone for our shortcomings....Do you????? We accept responsibility for our actions and results. Do You? Oh no that's right, you have George Bush, or some other polititian to blame for anything wrong in your life...

Answer 4

I totally disagree with your thinking. Bush has always accepted responsibility for HIS doings. However, he doesn't take responsibility for things that were not in his control-just as you wouldn't either, I'm sure. He doesn't ignore reality. He sees it as HE sees it-again like I'm sure you see reality in your own way. And, I believe he only places blame where the blame surely lies. Seems to me YOU'VE been tipping the bottle yourself if this is the way you see things. Why do you opponents of Bush always place ALL blame for EVERYTHING that has ever gone wrong in this country squarely on Bush's shoulders?? Our Congressional representatives carry a lot of responsibility for making things happen (or not happen as the case may be) in this country. I know, it's just easier to blame someone you don't like. How immature.

Answer 5

i imagine that between the biggest ameliorations between the Dems and Reps is that the Democrats are for further tender than Republicans. i imagine that Democrats use their emotions more desirable than Republicans do to sparkling up issues. They care extra about the straightforward guy, the guy who's being exploited with the help of his boss, and the guy who needs help. That being reported i imagine that Republicans are a lot extra purpose. they're going to cope with issues in way that commonly seems chillier, yet is often extra valuable. Republicans are keen to interrupt eggs to make an omelette, although the Democrats pick to be sure that the fewest type of eggs should be damaged. the US needs both mentalities. good judgment without emotion will be very risky, yet emotion without good judgment receives us nowhere. to respond to: Bush makes his judgements in holding with both, yet he leans in course of excellent judgment.

Answer 6

lol, you just typified a lib!!!! so what you're saying is... bush is unwilling to accept responsibility for mistakes that Libs claim he's made, ignores reality that the Left has deemed reality, and blames Libs for their stupidity... hmmmm, nothing wrong with any of that... to me, that's a pattern of a person that is not deterred by idiocracy.

Answer 7

It's the classic thinking pattern of a spoiled fifth grade bully.

Answer 8

Lets talk about Bill And Hillary.Why would she marry the son of a prostitute?Why did he marry someone who hates men?

Answer 9

Yeah or the classic thinking pattern of an Idiot. You choose

Answer 10

Hey you have just describe the traits of a typical liberal?