Did Bush set our country up on 9/11 or was it really the Al Quida?

Answer 1

Al-Qaeda. I've not seen good evidence that Bush "planned" it. A better question would be to look at how he addressed it afterwards.....

Answer 2

I'm not a Bush fan, but I do not believe he had anything to do with 9/11. It was Al Qaeda. There is no proof that it was anyone else and there is plenty substantiation that it was Al Qaeda.

Answer 3

The 9-11 conspiracy theory is garbage. It was NOT an inside job. Here's a stunning, knock-out blow that kills the theory:

==> Almost every single expert has come out against the 9-11 conspiracy theory. Numerous articles against the theory have been published in peer-reviewed journals. ZERO articles have been published by the so-called conspiracy "experts." Essentially, they have no name, no respect, no significance. THERE IS NO COUNTERARGUMENT TO THIS. Are the experts all “in on it”?

Here are some peer-reviewed articles showing that 9-11 was NOT an inside job:


Engineers Explain WTC Collapse
http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html
Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp
IT WAS THE FIRE, CAUSED THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE - icivilengineer.com
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact - Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22
Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.
"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.
Brannigan, F.L.
"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.
Clifton, Charles G.
Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.
"Construction and Collapse Factors"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.
Corbett, G.P.
"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"
Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.
"Dissecting the Collapses"
Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.
Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.
"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"
JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.
World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations
(also available on-line)
Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.
"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"
The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.
Glover, N.J.
"Collapse Lessons"
Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103
Marechaux, T.G.
"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"
JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.
Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.
Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.
National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs
“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”
Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.
Pinsker, Lisa, M.
"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"
Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).
The print copy has 3-D images.
Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)
Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.
NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)
Post, N.M.
"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"
ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.
Post, N.M.
"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"
ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.
The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering
World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects
A resource site.
"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"
ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.
The Towers Lost and Beyond
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Eduardo Kausel, John E. Fernandez, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Liang Xue, Meg Hendry-Brogan, Ahmed F. Ghoniem, Oral Buyukozturk, Franz-Josef Ulm, Yossi Sheffi

Answer 4

You are asking for tin-foil hats with this question. It was Al Qaida but Bush is culpable because he did nothing to prevent the attacks even though he was told there was a danger.

Answer 5

Al Queda is really the CIA and other intelligent agencies networking together to control other countries and their resources.

911 was an inside job "False Flag" operation. Just like "Operation Northwoods" Google..... "Operation Northwoods" and have yourself a look.

False Flag operations are basically the American Way. We've been doing it for over 100 years.

Here is a very interesting site that is quite informative..
http://www.physics911.net/

Answer 6

I believe there is credible evidence to assume that the Bush administration participated in - or at least knew about - the 9-11 'terrorist attacks'. Consider that:
a) George W. Bush's younger brother was head of security for the Twin Towers prior to the attacks;
b) Larry Silverstein had a 'white elephant' on his hands and wanted the Bush administration to help him recover financial losses he'd incurred over the years;
c) The steel and debris from the destruction was quickly disposed of instead of being stored for further investigation and evaluation (in fact, much of the steel was used to build a new U.S. battleship);
d) Demolition experts were allegedly in the building prior to the explosions, and certain floors were closed to the public for days before the attacks took place;
e) Controversies surround the 'attacks' on the Pentagon and the fate of passengers on Flight 93 that supposedly crashed in a Pennsylvania field (while the Cleveland-Hopkins airport was closed at, ironically, the same time);
f) Many analysts and witnesses have reported that the implosions had to be the result of bombs that were detonated from inside the buildings.

Now, for all the 'naysayers' that don't believe our government would ever lie to us about such a tragedy, consider this:
a) Our government LIED about the effects of Agent Orange on Vietnam veterans;
b) Our government has never fully explained to the satisfaction of [those who were there] the events surrounding Roswell, New Mexico in 1947;
c) Our government LIED about U-2 spy planes flying over the U.S.S.R. until Krushchev shot one down and displayed it for the entire world to see;
d) Our government exaggerated the facts about U.S. ships being attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin that led us into the Vietnam War;
e) Our government LIED to us about "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq that led us into the current 'war' we're so hopelessly mired in;
f) Our government LIED to us about 'secret' CIA prisons and the torture and abuse of detainees in direct violation of the rules of the Geneva Convention, which the U.S. signed and agreed to;
g) Our government denies the existence of Area 51, even though it's designated on official government maps;
h) Our government LIED to us about a third-rate burglary in the Watergate Hotel until two enterprising reporters dug out the truth that brought down a U.S. President.

Benjamin Franklin once said: "When people fear the government, it is tyranny. When government fears the people, it is liberty." We NEED to be skeptical about what our government tells us; that once was the job of the free press (the "Fourth Estate"). Now, we find it easier, more convenient, and more cost-efficient to just take the government's word for it, right off the official press release, and ignore any evidence to the contrary. -RKO- 05/03/07

Answer 7

For answers:
www.whatreallyhappened.com
www.serendipity.li

Answer 8

This Question doesn't even deserve any response.