dont bother answering if your gonna be a smart *** im trying to make a point here thank you
2007-05-03 05:25:46 · 40 answers · asked by samman 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
A dope smoker, but both are wrong.
2007-05-03 05:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
When you say dope do you mean any kind of dope or just Pot? If it is just any dope then I would choose neither. Or, maybe the paedaphile cause there are no little children in my home.
Actually either would be welcome in my home for dinner. I choose not to judge others & accept who they are and not what they are. As long as they do not try to cram their lifestyle on me I am OK with it. I believe in karma & so I try to keep in mind that what they do will come back on them, if not in this life time then in another. What comes around goes around.
2007-05-03 05:45:50 · answer #2 · answered by bluebonnetgranny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well to tell the truth I would not invite either. 1 Because I have kids in my house. To be honest I would not have friends like that, i mean if one were to go down those paths I wouls still be a friend and by being a friend I would cut them out of my life until they had there issue resolved and then I would have to think hard about letting the doper back in my house, trust me it would be a while b4 that happened. As for a gropper? NO WAY what so ever would I allow in my home ppl like that are sick and need way more help than any friend can offer. I guess Id eat alone if those were my only 2 choses.
2007-05-03 05:37:52 · answer #3 · answered by Jules 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dope smoker
2007-05-03 05:36:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dope smoker depending on how much and how it effects there ability to communicate in a dinner party environment. Some dope smokers are intelligent people with amazing sense of humours but if they couldn't comprehend what was going on around them i would boot them out. as for a paedophile - no way never!
unless of course you were feeding him his own penis that had been removed in a brutal way without anesthetic
2007-05-03 05:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by carlyjayne 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not trying to be smart but I feel I must answer your question this way. I would PREFER neither of them but the less of the two evils would be the dope smoker.
2007-05-03 05:40:01 · answer #6 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I knew a person was a pedophile, the last thing I would do would be to ask them for dinner. As for dope smokers, I don't let anyone who is loaded enter my house. so my answer to your question would be Neither.
2007-05-03 05:36:35 · answer #7 · answered by charliecizarny 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dope smoker obviously. Paedophilia is a serious crime whereas dope really only screws up the person who uses it.
2007-05-03 05:50:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Weird question! Definatley the dope smoker. I agree with the others but it wouldn't just be nasty food I would poison the bastard and make sure it gives him a slow and painful death!!!
2007-05-03 05:44:29 · answer #9 · answered by Weedy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think either would be interesting. Dope smokers have their stories. Peds have such deep psychological sickness. Either one would be interesting to talk to. Although, I agree. The ped would get some sort of nasty surprise in their dinner.
2007-05-03 05:35:00 · answer #10 · answered by Trixie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dope smoker as they come from all walks of life and are more likely to be the same as a drunk person, but if i knew they were a paedo i dont think i could sit and talk to them.
what kind of point are you trying to make?
2007-05-03 05:32:58 · answer #11 · answered by ben c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋