English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Strong moral values.

Strong security posture (protect our borders at home and our interests abroad).

2007-05-03 03:24:46 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Its really sad that people ever came to vote for a party rather than a person. To always vote on party lines shows a distinct laziness or blindness. Don't want to research the issues, just go with one or other of the outdated ideologies. Means you don't have to actually think.

I will vote for the BEST candidate, regardless of party. The candidate who, in my opinion will be best for the country and its people. Obviously, none of them will agree with everything I believe but I will look at them and decide which is the closest fit.

2007-05-03 03:44:11 · answer #1 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 2 0

the 1st sign that could desire to come to my recommendations is Gemini, as that's a mutable Air sign and extremely verbal exchange by using nature (talkative - jack of all trades, grasp of none!) or what you call 'exhibiting off intelligence'. Geminis are additionally actual bored and under pressure by using nature, as they are in a position to multi-activity like no person else can. considering they are governed by using mercuty (the planet of verbal exchange), they are additionally very intellectually inspired by using new instruments and suggestions, albeit with a low boredom threshold. and because there are literally 2 aspects of them as represented by using the Twins, they are in a position to be particularly fickle-minded and not be responsive to what they choose out of a companion! working an in depth 2d could be Aries, for my area...besides the undeniable fact that lots could fairly matter on the Moon and Ascendent placements of the guy's birthchart to boot.

2016-10-14 10:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yes I would vote for them.

But I am also looking for someone who recognizes that I have a family to raise and that I don't want a unnecessary tax burden on my income to provide a national healthcare system or pay for social programs that have not achieve their goals.

I thought the goal of the social program was to give the poor a hand and make them an independent and hard working, not dependent on a monthly government check.

2007-05-03 03:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

ANY Democrat with a strong security posture would have a leg up on many others in the party at this point.

I'd be happy to hear the rest of this candidate's program!

2007-05-03 03:32:23 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3 2

Considering what dems consider moral probably not lol. If they had true morals they will never make it anywhere in that party anyway. Obama seems like a nice guy but I predict that hillary and edwards will join forces and stab him in the back she will get low down and dirty with him b4 it's over.

2007-05-03 03:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by barrys 3 · 0 2

No. The only kind of Deomcrat [sic] that I'd support is one who acknowledged that Supreme Court decisions like Roe v. Wade and Lawrence v. Texas were atrocious abuses of judicial discretion.

2007-05-03 03:47:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Absolutely...I am more about character than political party.

I am supporting Obama for the '08 elections, and hoping a praying that we won't have another round of the Billary circus.

2007-05-03 03:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Possibly. I think that financial responsibility is high up on my list, too. I don't want people in office who are going to give away more of my hard earned money to people who won't work and expect a hand out. My taxes are high enough. Lets get back to communities and churches taking care of their people, not government. Too much money is wasted on the beauracracy instead of helping people who need it.

2007-05-03 03:31:22 · answer #8 · answered by Daybreak 5 · 5 2

Absolutely NOT! Democrats do not have strong moral values and they NEVER stand up for what they believe in while Republicans Stand For The TRUTH and NEVER LIE ABOUT IT while Democrats always LIE TO THEIR Constituents.

2007-05-03 03:36:11 · answer #9 · answered by Jody C 1 · 1 3

Probably not. Until the democrat party denounces the promotion of it socialist stance and openly calls for their removal from their party their is no way, in good conscious that I can ever support that party or anyone belonging to it.

2007-05-03 03:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers