If it has then WHY?
2007-05-03 01:53:59 · 4 answers · asked by Hamish 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
I`m hardly for roaming rapists! I am also not for people going to Mexico and breaking their laws to try to collect the huge reward.
2007-05-03 05:33:16 · update #1
http://www.aetv.com/ can tell you all about the DOG.
2007-05-03 04:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by mothermayhem 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't answer that, but there have been times where the people Dog has captured have turned themselves in and he lost out on that bail money. Being a bounty hunter is tough work. They deserve every bit of the money they make. I commend Dog for going to Mexico to get that guy. He obviously wasn't man enough to face charges, so he had to flee to Mexico and hide. Two thumbs up to Dog and his crew.
2007-05-03 19:37:45 · answer #2 · answered by 2Beagles 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from your question I assume you are all for rapists raping this country's women and then fleeing to Mexico to avoid prosecution. Wake up criminals should not be walking our streets to commit more crimes. And the reason there are not is because of men like dog.They should not be running to mexico to be harbored either . It burns me up that dog is even trying to be prosecuted for this . I say Thank God for real men like Dwayne "Dog " Chapman .
2007-05-03 12:26:35 · answer #3 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i don't think it is completely dropped, but it should be because if he didn't catch that rapist then more women would have gotten raped and probably murdered. besides that guy was hell rich he could've had any girl he wanted anyway, but he decides to drug and rape them....RETARDED!
& he wasn't trying to get a reward he was trying to catch a rapist that was from USA, but he fled to Mexico to hide out.
2007-05-03 19:29:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋