English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.alqaeda.links/

This should answer the lib question as to why Saddam never had any problems with Al Qaeda before the US showed up.

2007-05-02 17:26:49 · 14 answers · asked by JudiBug 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Why do libs have a hard time facing the truth?

2007-05-02 17:50:11 · update #1

14 answers

They actually had several.

Al Qa'ida was active in north eastern Iraq with a group called al Islam.

The Clinton Administration received testimony from a guy named al Libby that Al Qa-ida had regularly received chemical weapons training from Saddam's army.

Saddam himself trained somewhere just north of 10,000 terrorists in his own programs, one of the training bases was Salman Pak, the same place where anthrax was being developed.

Liberals are the last people on earth who seem to understand these things. It's as if the 90s have been scrubbed from their memories.

2007-05-02 17:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

In 2005 the National Intelligence Council, a CIA think tank which relies on the input from 1000 sources, reported that Iraq became a breeding ground after Saddam was deposed:

"Before the U.S. invasion, the CIA said Saddam Hussein had only circumstantial ties with several al Qaeda members. Osama bin Laden rejected the idea of forming an alliance with Hussein and viewed him as an enemy of the jihadist movement because the Iraqi leader rejected radical Islamic ideal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7460-2005Jan13.html

2007-05-03 00:12:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

i think of the Iraq conflict became into respected. i'm happy we've been given rid of Saddam and his sons. Saddam became into not letting the inspectors in and he by no ability could have in my opinion. UN sanctions are a shaggy dog tale the UN is a paper tiger and that i think of the full midsection east knows this o.k.. the only subject maximum midsection jap worldwide places comprehend is militia tension. i even have faith area of the concern with those wars is that we are actually not combating to win, we attempt to make all of us happy and we (the U. S.) can not do this. I choose that we would deliver in our Air tension to shelter commercial business enterprise in Afghanistan while that's mandatory.

2016-10-14 10:14:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Al Qaeda supposely has cells everywhere even here in
the U.S.. Know one know for sure, not Rep's or Dem's
so this isn't a political thing, it is a terrorist
thing and it is real. By the way Sneebs, Katrina hit
Mississippi.

2007-05-03 04:25:19 · answer #4 · answered by Precious Gem 7 · 0 2

An article from February 3, 2003? Yeah, and that's just when we were all being fed this load of horse dung, which has since been disavowed by George Bush himself. Got anything else?

2007-05-02 17:35:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

That was not independent information but information from the Bush administration used only to justify their own actions. It is called conflict of interest. Get an independent source next time.

2007-05-02 17:39:59 · answer #6 · answered by beren 7 · 3 2

It doesn't matter if anyone knows that. People are going to believe what they want to believe. It doesn't matter how much evidence you put in front of them. They are still going to believe that Pres. Bush is the devil and he stood on top on the White House with his magic wand and made Katrina hit New Orleans. All because he hates.........

2007-05-02 17:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by Sneebs 4 · 2 2

Well then George Bush Snr should have got rid of him then.

2007-05-02 18:54:16 · answer #8 · answered by molly 7 · 3 0

Actually Sadaam didn't much care for Al Qaeda, he was afraid they might undermine his authority.

2007-05-02 17:33:33 · answer #9 · answered by Katie 4 · 4 2

If a Republican gets caught telling the truth do they take away their decoder ring and remove the plastic surgery that covers up their lobotomy scar ?

2007-05-02 17:34:53 · answer #10 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers