...and what will they do about their friends, Rage Against the Machine?
2007-05-02 17:11:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She's baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!
2007-05-02 17:15:54 · answer #1 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I know of very, very few "liberal" Democrats in congress these days. I know even fewer who are making unlawful statements (whatever the law is now... so much for free speech). That crime is a whole lot less significant than the violation of international law perpetrated by the United States. "Conservatives", Democrats and Republicans alike are funding an illegal occupation that devastates entire populations.
Why do Democrats and Republican conservatives fund terrorist attacks on innocent citizens that kill and maim hundreds of thousands of people? Could it be related to oil, drugs, profiteering, and weapons sales?
Who is the real terrorist here?
The casualties are close to 700,000 human lives.
2007-05-02 17:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the biggest risk to u . s . a . is the UN-human beings between us. This Presidency has presented out an anti-democracy reveal it really is unnerving to make sure. imagine what you pick about the guy yet at the same time as he's elected purchase a majority of the persons he must have help from all the persons a minimum of on the starting up of his time period. What has shown it grotesque head this time is human beings desirous to overthrow the democratic procedure for no different reason than they don't like the guy. it really is Un - American in besides structure or type.Elected places of paintings publicly saying they pick him to fail and some saying they pick u . s . a . to fail so he fails, it really is purely incorrect.
2016-11-24 22:23:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what did they say again? they wanted to hang and shoot Bush and co. or something? right?
no different than the conservative clowns on here that say the same about reid and pelosi daily...
oh, but it's ok when they do it? right?
I think it's all a little over the top, but if one is punished, they all should be...
but Rage has been saying those things for years... even under Clinton...
were you complaining about it then?
2007-05-02 17:19:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
While on the record they will probably speak against them and say "ya its wrong BUT..." and then in private high-5 each other and say amen just like they probably did after Huge Chavez called Bush Satan at the UN.
2007-05-02 17:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bring back the federalist party. And the free masons Get rid of democrats and republicans. All of them are liars any way. we need common people in our government.
2007-05-02 17:30:11 · answer #6 · answered by comon sence 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do not make the mistake of calling a Liberal an extremist...they are idealistic, but are not responsible for extremists the same way you are not responsible for the KKK
2007-05-02 17:22:02 · answer #7 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you spend your time going after the REAL terrorists, chickie? Go SQUAK in an Iraqi sandbox for a while!
http://www.goarmy.com
2007-05-02 17:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by Sangria 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Could you show some evidence of this?
Not my friends.
Fascist Republicans: Why do they create more terrorists?
...and what will they do about their friends, Prince Abdullah and crew?
2007-05-02 20:17:17 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A better question: Why don't neocons obey the Constitution?
Ron Paul 2008
2007-05-02 17:17:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
If somebody made such threats they should be persecuted under the law. Political affiliation is irrelevant unless you can somehow prove that all liberal democrats make such threats then perhaps further action may be prudent.
2007-05-02 17:17:43 · answer #11 · answered by beren 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋