2007-05-02 16:45:44 · 9 answers · asked by HeatFan (Wade's House Still! 5 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
The only positive this is Hitler committed suicide and his cronies that were caught, were put on trial and punished for their crimes against humanity. And to this very day the Jews still seek to find any that might be left in the world today.
The crimes against humanity continue though. The Khmer Rouge (Viet Nam), Bosnia and Serbia, Iraq and the Kurds namely Saddam Hussein,
and our new found modern assassins , the Radical Muslims in the name of Allah. So I really am unable to find anything positive. The killings continue. what lesson has been learned has been learned by only a few. The hate, the anger the racisim is all still here. I myself have a name for it. Satan.
2007-05-02 17:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by LucySD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason they are surely unconcerned approximately in spite of to do with the holocaust is that the holocaust does now no longer call the the e book on which their faith is predicated into question. Evolution, physics, cosmology and geology show the Bible as an entire artwork of fiction. As an aside it is thrilling that rabid muslims and a few $christian sects are prepared to deny the holocaust. We even have the Pope elevating a holocaust denier to Bishop and an extra bishop in Germany seeking to declare that the holocaust was perpetrated via atheists.
2017-01-09 08:52:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
About the only positive I can think of is that it raised awareness of anti-Semitism, but certainly not worldwide, as we can see by how Jews were treated during the last half of the 20th century in the former Soviet Union, as well as how they have been treated in Arab nations.
As other posters have said, we still have mass racism, ethnic cleansing, concentration camps (Gitmo, anybody?), and other atrocities being committed against people simply because of their race or religion.
Human beings don't tend to learn much from history.
2007-05-02 16:57:09 · answer #3 · answered by j3nny3lf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Off the top off my head, I'd have to say the binding affect that the survivors have and the ripple effect to the families, and I would contrast with other groups who did not have that positive outcome after similar devastation as a group.
2007-05-02 20:04:12 · answer #4 · answered by duccees 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's insane. why would a school have you writing that?
there wasn't anything positive...we can't even say "well now we know better" because it is still happening around the world (ex. Darfur). This is what I would personally write. Write a paper on how there is nothing positive...but if I was forced to say something positive, at least now people don't name their kids Adolph.
2007-05-02 16:52:23 · answer #5 · answered by math guru 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A positive effect? If you want to be cheeky, you could use something like "it's provided endless topics for literature and movies." It also lead to a lot of emmigration ... This is a tough one.
2007-05-02 16:52:28 · answer #6 · answered by KT 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A positive? Ethnic cleansing has always been around and still continues today. I don't see the positive in this.
2007-05-02 16:53:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It shows just how far prejudice can be carried.
It should awaken people to the fact that we are all different in our own way(s), and if we don't recognize the uniqueness and dignity of everyone, any one of us could be in serious trouble.
2007-05-02 16:57:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it let people know that there is racism in the world and that there is hate. it helped to get people to know how horrible it is and try to stop it.
that's the only positive thing i can think of.
2007-05-02 16:53:34 · answer #9 · answered by Edith 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋