kidd is way better than nash in bringing his team. he averages 1x, 8, 9, points, rebounds, and assists per game. he deserves mvp.
2007-05-02 16:32:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
he just is in a cheap team, if he had the sun team without nash, dammmm
2007-05-02 16:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Overall he is better than Nash. He is equal or slightly better as a playmaker and a much better rebounder and defender. Nash is the better shooter though. If Kidd was on that Suns team with D'Antoni's system and those players surrounding him he'd have an MVP or too like Nash.
2007-05-02 23:48:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kidd deserved MVP in 2003, but got robed by, Tim Duncan....His team went from Lottery team to a number 2 seed...Yea he is one of the best PG in NBA History. He has had a great season this year..avg a career high in rebounds (8.2) and is avg a triple double in the playoffs!
2007-05-02 23:45:58 · answer #3 · answered by 229Time 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kidd just didnt have a good team surrounding him...
2007-05-03 04:15:37 · answer #4 · answered by chucky a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya, but all kidd has is Vince Carter now
2007-05-02 23:39:48 · answer #5 · answered by Kvn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋