I don't care what religion you are, mormon, Catholic, it really doesn't matter, if we NEEDED to come together as a people, do you think that we would still do it? Or would it be everyone for themselves? If you know we needed to?
2007-05-02 16:05:49 · 11 answers · asked by Girly Q 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
How about something that every American (with the exception of Bush & Co.) can agree on: "ONE NATION UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION..."
Oh yeah, be more like Sen. Kucinich and CARRY IT ON YOU! It's the LEAST a patriot can do.
2007-05-02 16:25:33 · answer #1 · answered by Sangria 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I will tell you, do you remember the blackout in the mid-west a few years back? If that was a taste on how we would be if a disaster hit then I think it would be nothing but pure pandemonium. People were fighting and shooting each other in the streets for gas and bread. It was a very scary thing and I hope nothing like that happens again in my lifetime.And it certainly wasn't one nation under God after Hurricane Katrina either. It would and was everybody for themselves during those to instances. Good Question!
2007-05-02 23:20:08 · answer #2 · answered by carrie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why won't other Christian churches want us to help them with social issues, or let us join in on the National Day of Prayer, or anything like that? They accuse US of racism, yet, they practice their own form of bigotry when they exclude anyone they don't like the beliefs of.
2007-05-03 13:03:21 · answer #3 · answered by mormon_4_jesus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We didn't become "one nation under God" until the words "under God" were added in 1954. Strangely, it was around that time that everything went wrong. Social problems began to run rampant, the government corruption levels skyrocketed, and wars became common in every decade except the 80's. Perhaps we should honor our founding fathers and return to the point at which they wanted us to arrive: true religious freedom for all, not just those in power.
No way I will defend you until you defend my rights. I'm an atheist, and I'm not a liberal. I'm a libertarian.
2007-05-02 23:12:29 · answer #4 · answered by seattlefan74 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't subscribe to a nation under god as I believe that god does not exist. One nation under the nation seems more intelligent, especially since everyone in america is NOT CHRISTIAN!
2007-05-02 23:08:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Shouldn't it e three nations under God with the North American Union (NAU) well underway.
Or maybe most of US isn't aware of the progress of this critical change since it seems to have dodged the news media.
2007-05-02 23:13:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
More like "One nation under Gog." Mammon is his daddy and nothing motivates capitalistic pigs like good ole mammon in the trough.
2007-05-02 23:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES !! It just says god, it dosen't say which one. If leftest kooks have it thier way it will say "One nation under the United Nations" or "One nation under global warming".
2007-05-02 23:17:11 · answer #8 · answered by lennyspall@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As fractious as we are - when the chips are down, we are one country and would join together to protect it.
And, we are not "under god"........
2007-05-03 00:27:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think there are more good people here than evil...i like to think that we would all come together.
2007-05-02 23:08:50 · answer #10 · answered by sparklinbeeze 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋