If anything Democrats have been way to lenient in dealing with Bush.,
Does anyone recall his strong words against dmocrats before the 06 election? Or how hes found loopholes to sneak friends into office. The latest being appointing 2 more of his friends to office when Congress went on their Easter session for one week, where Bush found a loophole to instate 2 positions, when congress voted against them?
In looking at his distain for democracy and government oversight, and by taking into consideration all his pre presidential actions and comments -- Its easy to point to a president whos not doing a good job.
THATS not giving him enough credit.
Hes a political mastermind. And if he was able and willing to lead us into this war, and continually works to keep us there despite no true efforts made by IRAQ government, then could it be hes just plain greedy.
Dems should wake up and realize they are dealing with an evil dictator!!!!!
And deal with him accordingly
2007-05-02
15:36:41
·
18 answers
·
asked by
writersbIock2006
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
asmike -- youre right about getting into the history books - as the worst president to even assume office
2007-05-02
15:45:04 ·
update #1
He is both - incompetent and evil. Not to mention stupid, stubborn and a hick. I am ashamed that he is our president. He has ruined our conutry, and has sent our troops die to not admit he is a failure when it comes to Iraq.
2007-05-02 15:40:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Crystal S 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
I'd have to disagree with you...Evil, incompetence ended when "slick Willie and his idiot wife left office". Talk about appointing "friends".
By the way have you personally BEEN to Iraq?If you have ok, but if you get your news from the tv or papers, you know nothing of this government and their efforts at governing themselves. Have you forgotten how we became the United States? We had a war? Recall the Revolution.
The soldiers fighting this war come back saying there are things being done....these people have no idea how to lead a democracy. They have had such tirants torturing them for so long. The Iraqis are of a very different way of living....Don't think that we are over there killing them for the fun of it. Nor they killing our soldiers...
Remember 9/11? Kind souls they wereover in the middle East to do that. Oh, and beheading people...gosh we better get out of there. Then, not having accomplished getting those who are willing ( which accounts for many) to have a better sytem of government, we can begin this whole thing all over again.
This war is awful, but what war is not. Was Vietnam pleasant? Did the Civil War have no casualties? This is war against very sick people unlike any wars we have been in...and we better finish it.
Much to your dismay...I agree with Bush. If the left gets into office all those lives have been lost for nothing, and we will be up s_ _ ts creek without a paddle. Keep in mind how much we're hated, and try to stay away from liberal propaganda....
As far as not doing a good job....he fixed the economy after the disastrous Clinton years of do nothing government.
2007-05-02 16:32:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by giraffe510 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
Go back through some old Vanity Fair articles incuding May 06 and the rape of the Appalachian's. EVIL and stupid. He has done so much to damage this country, not only with war but with the environment. HE is nothing more than a puppet for the men with the real power. Before the Republicans get on their soapbox let's look at New Orleans -- who can possibly justify having a president that doesn't want to be bothered with running the country while on vacation to the point his own staffers were afraid to tell him to turn on at least FOX news! That's heartless. And what the hell happened to Karen Hughes -- she disappeared again didn't she. That says a lot. She was supposed to help pull his ratings up wasn't she? Hell, you don't even see Mary Matlin jumping to his defense anymore on talking head TV and It's really bad when top republican military leaders don't want want a position with him. And.....it's horribly bad when Ann Coulter won't support him! FOR THE PEOPLE/PERSON WHO MADE PERSONAL INSULTS TO THE QUESTION - REMEMBER, ONLY THOSE FEELING THREATENED STRIKE OUT. HOW ABOUT KEEPING YOUR PERSONAL INSULTS OUT OF IT AND STICK TO THE QUESTION?
2007-05-02 15:45:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cash 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your question implies that he must be one or the other. If he's not merely incompetent then there is something very fishy going on. The fact that he's surrounded by some very brilliant people further leads to the suspicion that something ugly this way comes.
I don't believe in evil that can't be stopped through the vigilance of the people, however, and if things are as bad as they seem then we've allowed it.
Recess appointments are allowed for by the Constitution, by the way, and can be dealt with as soon as Congress reconvenes. They hardly constitute evil.
2007-05-02 15:45:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Barrett 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
My greatest gripe hostile to Bush is his handling of the Iraq conflict, which i'd say has been incompetent. i do not oppose using protection force stress at the same time as necessary, in actuality I supported the eliminating of Saddam. i do not although help police movements. the base line is: once you contain your self in a police action, there are too many rules and too many political obstacles that tie your palms.
2016-11-24 22:12:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If by "mastermind" you mean he's willing to overlook any and all ethical violations and have total disregard for the truth in order to get his way, then I'll conceed that point.
Incompetent, yes. He's spent record amounts of tax dollars while achieving nothing. And he started a war he didn't have to then was a total failure as commander in chief.
Evil, yes. He responded to a question from a reporter once about how many Iraqis had died to date and he estimated 30,000 with all the passion one would answer "what time is it". He sees everyone outsoide his circle of wealthy supporters as cannon fodder to be used in his mission to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of fewer and fewer people.
2007-05-02 15:57:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
He is doing a wonderful job of creating profit opportunities for his corporate masters.
He did not steal the presidency twice because of his love of democracy or the American people.
He's there to make his handlers the wealthiest, most powerful scum on the planet.
And with that, he's doin just great
The Democrats are not coming down hard on Bush because they are all employees of Corporate America. Their differences are minimal
2007-05-02 15:53:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Peace Warrior 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Do not put it all on Bush. I feel we have really screwed up and the republicans will suffer the consequences. Bush can not wipe his a s s without an opinion of the cabinet. He did choose them but there is a fly in the ointment.
2007-05-02 15:50:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pablo 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
He's to stupid to be evil so I'd say he's incompetent !! He has employees' that think for him and write his really bad scrips to the public. I think you give him to much credit !!! It's sad the WORLD looks at him like a hillbillie joke !! But he is so stupid that makes him Dangerous !!
2007-05-02 15:59:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Polar Molar 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I wish we had someone like ted nugent as a dem or something. Michael moore and many more try so hard and the fox news and other people try to degrade what he says and they cannot. Dems need to play dirty like the rupukeicans.
2007-05-02 15:40:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋