It makes a lot of sense to me...but only if the donations are shared with all people and not just wealthy people who can afford the procedures involved. I'd like to be CEO of that operation! Annie
2007-05-02 15:51:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that offering them the option is a good idea. I have a friend that is only alive because of a donor the donor stays anonymous the individual gets to live longer. Making them do it is wrong and testing should be conducted for pathogens and such. If I had a dying relative or friend and the only thing that could save them was a organ donation I don't thing they would care where it came from.
2007-05-02 15:40:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by MetalMonkey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure.........let 'em give something good back to society. And I don't think the word compel is really what fits for Chinese prisoners........I think it's more like mandatory.
2007-05-02 15:37:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nagitar™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it is a good idea, but why are you asking the third question about donors???
2007-05-02 15:36:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Roxolana 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Compel, no but offering it to them is a good idea.
2007-05-02 15:35:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lov'n IT! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like your idea....that way they can give back life that they took away. Why stop in China....let's do it everywhere!
2007-05-02 15:37:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mustang Sally 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Its forced which goes against the very principle of "donation".
2007-05-02 15:38:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Meeya 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
uuuuuuummmmmmmmm Nnnoooo
2007-05-02 15:36:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rakib 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah!
2007-05-02 15:35:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ηєvєrmorє 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
they already, do that in TEXAS. We do things differently here than, they do them over in the UNITED STATES.
2007-05-02 15:37:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by ny21tb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋