look at the lies about the war!
2007-05-02 15:20:48 · 17 answers · asked by ed t 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
WHich lies?
Lying is not illegal, only when under oath.
Why impeach someone who will be out in a little over a year.
Impeachment only means trial.
The Congress does it.
The Congress could not even overcome his veto, so no hope there.
So, I would have to say NO.
2007-05-02 15:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by Oldvet 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, the Bush cabinet and all 535 members of the most arrogant, cowardly, incompetent, corrupt U.S. Congress in history (that foolishly did nothing to stop Bush from this illegal and unconstitutional 'war') should ALL be tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, and - if convicted - should hang, just as Hussein was hanged.
Consider this:
Joseph Stalin slaughtered 10 million of his countrymen and died peacefully in his sleep;
Adolph Hitler gassed 6 million Jews and committed suicide before being brought to justice;
Idi Amin killed 2 million people in Uganda and retired in luxurious exile;
Saddam Hussein massacred more than a million Iraqis and was hanged after a mock trial manipulated and controlled by the Bush administration;
George W. Bush has accepted no responsibility for the killing of 675,000 Iraqi citizens and 3,300 U.S. soldiers (to date).
Bush shouldn't be impeached; his crimes must be tried in an international arena, where all civilized people of the world unanimously agree that he be hanged for his inhumane atrocities. -RKO- 05/02/07
2007-05-02 16:02:19 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you nonetheless disillusioned that the Dems have been overwhelmed interior the final 2 Presidential elections? "His father charged with conflict crimes"? what's that rant all approximately? And no, President Bush has carried out no longer something that rises to the point of impeachment, no longer basically like the Clinton humorous tale. Loosen the tin-foil hat and run to the window......any black helos obtainable this night? LOL!
2016-12-10 17:52:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another bad case of Selective Memory Syndrome. Hey, Far Left Robot how many of that 585 voted to go to war, huhhhmmmmm? Only the Golden Boy voted against it, and only because he didn't understand the question.
You still haven't shown any provable lies. Lay back and enjoy the rest of the ride or you will get an ulcer for all of this raving.
2007-05-02 16:32:51 · answer #4 · answered by jube 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you even have a clue what "war crimes" are? Bush has done nothing that comes close to warranting impeachment. If he had, the Democrat majority would have moved on it already. Even your party leaders know it.
Read something other than tabloids and liberal based papers and inform yourself.
2007-05-02 15:46:06 · answer #5 · answered by ProudAmerican 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe George Bush is unimpeachable but should be charged with dereliction of duty for for not wiping out Syria and Iran .
The only war crime he commited is not tracking you down .
2007-05-02 15:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by Rocky 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
neither it is a waste of time to impeach a president for incompetence. We have much more important things to do. And anyway you impeach Bush, then what you impeach Cheney. before any of this gets done its already time for the 08 elections. Why would we waste the time and money.
2007-05-02 15:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just what I like, a multiple choice question. You know the old adage about every @ss enjoying hearing himself bray? Your braying here reminded me of that quip. All you need is some proof and I'm sure the democommies named Nancy and Joe will be thrilled to accommodate you. Fact of the matter, they will both have orgasms as they write the petition.
2007-05-02 15:37:19 · answer #8 · answered by just the facts 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes Hell I am still waiting for his to be charged for being AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard, while he was drunk in Alabama
2007-05-02 18:11:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but Nancy Pelosi should be charged with treason for overstepping her authority in going to the middle-east and negotiating and making deals she had no authority to make.
2007-05-02 15:24:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋