For example, they attack Pelosi for visiting Sudan, but fail to mention three Republicans visited before her, and one visited right after her. Isn't that just propaganda?
They attack Clinton for cheating on his wife, and then it turns out the guy leading the charge, conservative Republican Newt Gingrish was cheating on his wife at the same time. Isn't that just extraordinary hypocracy?
They cite stories about global warming in Pluto (trying to convince you its the sun) without mentioning the fact that the scientist cited in the story said it had absolutely nothing to do with the sun.
They copy and paste wikipedia articles about individual scientists against man made global warming without mentioning the fact that the article that they copied from is titled "scientists against the MAINSTREAM scientific assesment of global warming."
They attack Democrats for pork, without mentioning the fact that pork absolutely skyrocketed during the 12 or so years they were in power.
2007-05-02 12:32:05 · 16 answers · asked by soldier_of_god 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
P stands for POWER and the middle name is Hungry....I am impressed too
2007-05-02 12:36:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I guess not, since hypocrisy begins with an "H."
And I could care less if Clinton cheats on his wife, I find it somewhat understandable, actually. What I do care about is that HE LIED UNDER OATH. He lied because admitting the truth would make his defense in the civil case brought by Paula Jones indefensible.
As for global warming. Thirty years ago, scientists were saying that there would be global cooling. There are still some Russian scientists that believe we will have a mini ice age in the next 10-12 years.
The science behind the global warming is not conclusive and not complete. One of the greatest proponents said that it would take 300 years to undo the greenhouse gas problem, even if we stopped using fossil fuel right now. When asked what could be done to reverse the process, she said that she felt that scientists could come up with a man made reversal. Well, based on that, why not just come up with a man made reversal now, and the we wouldn't have to worry about greenhouse gasses, period.
2007-05-02 12:50:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
On Pelosi, she is the Speaker of the House. She does not have the right to try and attempt to make treaties. She claimed she was speaking for the US and Israel, when she did not have the authority. Note, speaking the truth is not an attack. The problem if any is they did not speak out against the other Republicans. They were completely right for speaking out against Pelosi. You are completely wrong on this. No surprise though
On Clinton, he lied under oath and that is a crime. That was wrong. He should have been removed from office for that. Once again, one wrong does not excuse another. Clinton was wrong period. Just because someone else is wrong does not excuse their behavior.
Have not seen the story. Global Warming is a fraud for many reasons.
There is no such thing as consensus in science. Science either is or is not. You prove my point all by yourself.
On pork, once again, just because one wrong occurs does not excuse another.
2007-05-02 12:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The GOP gave us a option to reject "Welfare" ! What the hell is a innovative besides? call a spade a spade , you`re a liberal ! Yep the Liberals gave us medicare , social protection , medicaid , and then stole all of them broke to spend on greater nanny state schedule`s ; yep the liberals gave us "minimum salary" , however the GOP stated we didn`t enable that to be our purpose , yep the liberals gave us an extremely low bar to make one think of they have been doing as good as they might do , yep the liberals gave us`all a 40 hour artwork week , yet lest ye forget approximately , with the liberals tax hikes , y`all have now given us an eighty hour artwork week , because it now takes the two husband and spouse to cover the expenses incurred on an identical time as having to make a contribution back to medicare , medicaid , social protection , and all the different liberal nanny state failed regulations ; and on and on and on !
2017-01-09 08:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is there any point to your BS rant?
Yes all hail to the dem party of "We Lost" while soldiers are engaged in combat. Iraq is why America voted for Dems it is THE issue to deal with, so Pelosi blows off General Patreas's testimony before Congress. Clinton LIED under OATH to a Grand Jury, so thats OK with you..Murtha accusses Marines of cold-blooded murder (his words) before they are charged nevermind convicted. It is Mars that is also warming not Pluto which is no longer classified as a planet, honest mistake? rriiiiiiggggghhhhtttt.
Did you happen to ride with Hillary on 3 different jets as she went to a debate and had campaign stops where she discussed Global Warming and the need for us to cut down on emmissions? And repubs are hypocrites.
Least I am not a fool who believes the pathetic win political power at all costs loser party.
2007-05-02 12:41:13 · answer #5 · answered by jonepemberton 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Politics is not about purity. If politicians held more restraint and did not attack opposition hypocritically than a lot of information would never be leaked to the public.
If you had been caught in a sex scandal does that make it not okay to attack someone else and inform the public of another sex scandal?
Furthermore you use propaganda as if it meant a method of supporting your view. Freedom of the press allows your view to be challenged but would it make sense for the GOP to be critical of himself?
It is not the responsibility of politicians to give a fair and balanced interpretation of their actions it is the job of Fox (joking).
2007-05-02 12:40:40 · answer #6 · answered by gordongecko 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh, FFS! No one really gives a rats *** about the sex.
It was the PERJURY.
How many times do you need to be told?!?
IT WAS THE PERJURY!
LMFAO And don't *even* whine about wikipedia. I've seen it used *far* more by lefties. They'll whine that Fox News isn't a credible source, then list wikipedia.
2007-05-02 12:51:39 · answer #7 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hypocrisy?
Pork skyrocketed?
I give up. You are wrong on so many levels.
2007-05-02 12:43:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
You are out of the book "1984" by Orwell:
"Truth is lies,
And lies are truth".
(The Bizzaro World.)
You are funny, though.
2007-05-02 12:38:50 · answer #9 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Typical lib spin all hot air!!
What makes you so smart about pluto! there is no way to masure anything there !!! you guys get farther out in space every day!!!
2007-05-02 12:38:03 · answer #10 · answered by and socialism 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I was a Rockefeller Republican until the Christian Right destroyed my party. The thing that calls itself "Republican" today is a sham; it combines the worst of both parties.
We used to be fiscally responsible while still supporting social programs. Now they're the "Don't tax, but spendspendspend" party. Pitiful.
2007-05-02 12:40:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋