English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if tna and wwe raw was on the same time and day what company would you watch
me i would watch tna

2007-05-02 11:38:37 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

14 answers

change your avatar ugly bicth!........damn!!!!

2007-05-02 11:41:08 · answer #1 · answered by anti_wwe kid! 1 · 2 1

I would watch Raw. I've been watching it for about 8 years. Raw is 2 hours long and I like the wrestling style of the WWE wrestlers. TNA is just one hour long. TNA is mostly guys doing backflips, and stunts off of the top rope. WWE Raw gives more variety in types of matches. I've only watched TNA like 2 times. The only wrestlers that I have heard of that are on TNA are the ones that used to be in the WWE.

2007-05-02 18:49:32 · answer #2 · answered by AdrianClay 7 · 0 0

Raw.....TNA is unwatchable most of the time. TNA is just gimmick match after gimmick match that go no where. They ruin matches that people have wanted to see for years, example Sting/Angle last week, 2mins wasted. Go back even further to the first match between Angle/Styles lasted about 2mins and people would love to have seen a 30min classic that you know both men could have given. All TNA is wasted talent. The X-Division is what made TNA, and now the X-Division is a joke.

2007-05-02 19:32:42 · answer #3 · answered by Four Horsemen AKA NinersFan 7 · 0 0

I've always been a wwe fan but lately tna has been pretty good, but I still have 2 go wit raw.

2007-05-02 18:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd watch Raw. I like TNA, but the X Division is really all that holds my attention.

2007-05-02 19:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

tna sucks like batisteroids so ill watch raw

2007-05-02 18:47:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

TNA they have better jobbers writers story lines and to some degree better wrestlers.
there is a reason why good ol Vinnie has been afraid of them lately!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vinnie is going down hill with the matches being nothing but matches from the 80's and up to the mid 90's. It's as if they think that no one was watching or would remember them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-05-02 18:54:00 · answer #7 · answered by under his feathers 6 · 0 0

RAW but TNA is good

2007-05-02 18:41:50 · answer #8 · answered by Lights Out #3 5 · 1 0

wwe because tna are idiots

2007-05-02 18:42:07 · answer #9 · answered by rick r 4 · 0 1

raw

2007-05-02 18:47:06 · answer #10 · answered by Da Master of Da Rko PAC OFC 3 · 0 0

raw

2007-05-02 18:41:37 · answer #11 · answered by hbk-4-champ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers