Alot of cons say why do libs blame Bush for alot of things....do you know why.... because he admitted to it... don't you remember that and now some of you are blaming us libs for the war when we just want to leave.... don't blame us blame our president for being so stubborn... I just don't get how they can also say we are loading up the bill when the Bush Admin was the one who decided to spend all the money when they went to Iraq...
2007-05-02 11:22:05 · 11 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Who care's about the blame at this point....we can sit back and pick out the people at fault for every war in human history and still be no better for it....why not concentrate on a real question. How do we get out of there without loosing face, killing off millions of Iraqis and continuing the destruction of a nation's infrastructure?
2007-05-02 11:31:29 · answer #1 · answered by jw 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think it is pretty unanimous that this war could have been handled differently, even I'll admit that. But we have to much invested in Iraq to pull out prematurely. If we left now, every thing we have done the last 4 years would be in vain. We are close to getting the Iraqi police and military strong enough to where they can handle the civil war on their own. We that happens, we could pull out of Iraq. However until then we need to stay and fight.
2007-05-02 11:51:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
people who say that, or voted for Bush the 2d time are no longer genuine republicans... basically followers. Like people who persist with Fox information, Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck... those republicans with their conflict and hate-mongering are the reason we can lose this election. With McCain on the cost tag we ought to constantly. ... there is fairly no longer that plenty distinction with American perspectives basic. All this wasted power would desire to be positioned to greater effectual use attempting to resolve a number of those genuine issues... This election basically shows how ignorant we nonetheless are jointly in this u . s .. seventy 8% minorities nonetheless balloting for Obama, and seventy 8% of whites over 40 nonetheless balloting against Obama (whoever the candidate is), and girls persons basically elect a to be taken care of "fairly" while fairness and government is the main important of all oxymorons. Even we republicans who voted for Ron Paul be conscious of that Obama will win. do no longer hear to what human beings SAY watch what they DO. basically seem the place everybody is putting their money interior the inventory industry... or Vegas for that remember.
2017-01-09 08:22:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If yoiu don't don't understand "loading up" the Bill with unnecessary pork then you need to read it again. If it's an emergency fuunding bill for the troops in Iraq (my son being one of them) there should not be things like milliions of dollars to peanut farmers in it...IT's A FUNDING BILL! You guys blame him for everything, EVERYTHING! Admit it?? out of context???? look again! You guys have backed yourself in a corner and I am laughing about it. You can't fund them, you won't withdraw troops like you said you would, and you are worried to death that this war will go on until 2008 and you take the white house...then lets see what happens!
2007-05-02 11:29:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush supporters are as dumb as Bush himself. Remember, there are quite a number of Republicans that don't like Bush either.
However, you know you can tell a dim witt Bush supporter, because they have already forgiven him for the mess he made, and they listen to O'lielly, Ann Coulter, and Hannity and Colms way too much to formulate their own opinion.
These are the same people that can't get through a book to save their lives.
2007-05-02 11:32:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Even Bush has forgotten. He still claims it is a war on terror. It is a war OF terror caused by Bush. It is a war designed to create terrorists, which is why terrorism is up 25%.
2007-05-02 11:30:40 · answer #6 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because unlike those Libs who now look the other way, the man was being gracious. He could easily have pointed his finger at many of your good friends, but he has more tact than that.
2007-05-02 11:28:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush take responsibility for everything, but just acted like an idiot on everything
Remember Katrina ? Bush "....I take full responsibility..."
2007-05-02 11:31:05 · answer #8 · answered by Taco 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Like most libs you took his words out of context. You're against the war, I'm for it so I'm not going to see your point and you won't see mine but I'm not trying to shove it down your throat either.
2007-05-02 11:25:40 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Selective memory... they only want to remember how much money they are making from murdering the Iraqi people.
2007-05-02 11:26:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋