on real GDP, inflation adjusted tax revenues, inflation adjusted median household wages, poverty rates, net jobs created, and national debt to see if their economic theories really hold weight?
I have.
It turns out Keynsesian Democrats like FDR, JFK/LBJ, and Clinton beat supply side Republicans like Reagan and Bush Jr on practically every category. The percent increase in real GDP, tax revenues, net jobs created, and median wages is higher under Dems then Republicans. Poverty drops under Keynesian Dems and tends to increase or stay the same under supply siders. I have posted the evidence numerous times. If you would like to convince yourself go right ahead. Look for the data I just listed. You will find it. Gather it all into one big excel sheet, find the percent increase, and go ahead and plot it if you'd like.
2007-05-02
10:29:37
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
A few items to note. JFK never cut taxes. He was killed before he had the chance to. The JFK/LBJ tax cut of 64' was not a real tax cut. Tax rates were lowered but tax loopholes were closed resulting in a net increase in tax revenues. Historical budget data will prove that. On the other hand, tax revenues dropped significantly under Reagan and Bush Jr because their tax cuts were HUGE.
What JFK and LBL were known for were their social programs. JFK for his "New Frontier" and LBJ for his "Great Society."
Another thing, if you think FDR is unfairly taking credit for growth due to WWII, just take the percent increase from the time he became president to right before WWII. You will find the percent increase in real GDP to be nearly twice as high as the next competitor (JFK/LBJ).
2007-05-02
10:33:09 ·
update #1