where does the current spurs dynasty fare among the best dynasties of all time?

Question

they have three titles, two mvp trophies(tim duncan), they have had three of theyre starters in the nba's top defensive team, and theyre always in the top five or ten in almost every category, and the have three all stars

Answer 1

What Dynasty?

3 titles in 8 years with no back 2 back wins

there has been no dominance like the laker 3 peat or anything like that. The spurs have followed titles with 1st and 2nd round losses. not exactly impressive

There are only a few legit dynasties in the NBA and they have all been done by either the Lakers, Celtics, or Bulls

Answer 2

The spurs are the most underlooked team in the NBA they have had some amazing players such as David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Tony Parker Manu Ginobili but no body knows about them because all the plublisity wants is Kobe and Dirk and Steve Nash. They never have any thing to say about tim Duncan being a two time Mvp and 3 time champions mvp. The spurs will be recognized one of these days as one of the best dynasty ever around, just give it some time. GO SPURS GO.

Answer 3

First of all, the spurs are a dynasty? Now the spurs have been a great team in the NBA for the past couple of years but that does not make them a Dynasty. The Boston Celtics were a dynasty, the UCLA Bruins were a dynasty. When you are completley and utterly dominant in your sport, then we can talk about dynastyship (made up word haha) Right now the Mavs, Suns, Heat, and Pistons all have the very same values that the spurs have (except the heat who are not in the playoffs.) When there is no question the the Spurs WILL win the ring, and then they do a couple times. The I will be convinced.

Answer 4

Never looked at the Spurs as a dynasty as the won the first two near each other and the third several years later (different roster other than Duncan). Not really a Lakers fan but the recent 3-peat Lakers have a better argument (as better team and a true dynasty) with 3 rings and a final in 5 years (Spurs won first two before Phil came to LA and third after Shaq and Phil left).

Duncan is a great player and the Spurs are always a very good team but in my opinion they will need to win at least one more this year or next to be considered a dynasty.

Answer 5

they defenetly have a good squad, but i dont think that parker and ginobli should have been all-stars. i think that none of them will next year, cuz i think baron davis has proven that he is the one who should play in there. but anyway. they probably could have been one of the best franchises if only david robinson and tim duncan played together for about ten years straight. i mean, now, u really cant put the spurs as a great franchise because everything is run by one player. but dont get me wrong, the spurs are an extremely good team. but what im trying to say is that a team that would be considered to have a "best dynasty" simply cant have only one superb player. look at the heat. they had 5 former all-stars, but just cuz they won 1 championship doesnt meen they are a dynasty. a dynasty would be like the chicago bull with mj. another would be the showtime lakers with magic and kareem. and probably another would be the jazz with stock and karl. but, if u look at all these teams, they all have 2 or more hall of famers. parker and ginobli just cant help this team become one of the greatest of all time. they just dont have that type of hall of fame talent like mj, or magic, or stockton had. tim duncan will not turn this spurs team into one of the best dynasties of all time. though i must admit, if u go by the way he played throught his career, i bet he could.

Answer 6

I like the Spurs, but I wouldn't consider their success a dynasty.

It's hard to have dynasty these days because of players are easily moved from one team to another, and also because there are so many teams that are successful a few years, then not so good the next.

I think we've seen the last of the dynasties, which were the Celtics, Lakers, and Bulls.

Answer 7

First off, let me say that I am a MAJOR Spurs fan! I am looking forward to seeing them close out the Nuggets tonight at home.

Now that I got that off my chest, I wouldn't exactly consider the Spurs a "dynasty".

When I think of "dynasty", I think of the Celtics, the Lakers, the Bulls.....teams who had multiple repeats and multiple championships. The Spurs have yet to repeat, and 3 years passed between their 1st and 2nd championship. This current team will probably be the last hurrah for them. They will need to start drafting younger talent if they want to be a dynasty. Winning the ring this season will be a good start, a repeat seems unlikely, but if it did happen, I think some analysts would probably consider them a dynasty.

The Spurs have a long way to go for me to consider them a dynasty....and that's coming from a Spurs fan.

Answer 8

They probably need one more with this group because most people don't see the first title in 99 as being a part of a dynasty since that team only featured Duncan as a major player other than him, the rest have changed (Avery Johnson- Tony Parker, Jaren Jackson-Manu Ginnobili, Jerome Kersey-Steve Kerr, etc)

Answer 9

Fair pretty well. They fair just as well as the lakers from 00-02 and the 76ers under wilt and prolly close to the pistons with joe dumars and isiah thomas. Its difficult to compare them to the boston dynasty or the lakers dynasty under kareem and magic, or the bulls dynasty under MJ. But they are one of the superior dynasties and they can still win a couple more.

Answer 10

LOL....What Dynasty?