fred s is right about st.louis. any list on this topic w/o the birds was written w/o having all the needed facts.
i like the Detroit idea, especially since the q. asked for cities not teams. the Dodgers replace the Tigers if you count their yrs. in Brooklyn also.
CITY (IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER)
ST.LOUIS
NY
CHI
BOSTON
DETROIT
2007-05-02 10:29:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by H.E. G 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In alphabetical order Boston, Chicago, LA, New York, St Louis. Think about this fenway is the olddest and smallest park in the MLB but has been upgraded simly because the fans have so much history and nostalgia wth that team and stadium, that team means more to that town then the celtics, pats, and bruins, combined. NY is divedided not by buroughs or water but by two teams the mets and yankees. I know NYers that are stil dodgers fans, and still refer to them as the brooklyn ddgers, you wot call anyone chearing for the philadelphia athletics, or the milwalkee braves. Chcago is the same diveded between north side and south side by the soxs and cubs, LA is slightly different I actually knw people wh are fans of bth claiming they can be because its AL and NL, and finaly St Louis, if youve ever been to a game it is a sea of red and white and most fans can tell you about how the saw ozzie smith play when they where ten. All these cities have love affairs with there teams, put baseball first, have incredible attentdance numbers and overall would riot in the streets for days at the thought of there teams going anywhere.
2007-05-02 16:42:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by paratroopersmith 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) New York
2) Boston
3) Brooklyn (the town DID GO insane when the Dodgers moved and too much history existed there)
4) Atlanta
5) Chicago (but not the Cubs...they would laugh and mutter "suckers...now you have the curse" to the unfortunate city)
edit: Philadelphia still has Pittsburgh and vice versa, Cleveland hasn't done anything since 1997 --- which they lost to Florida (?!?!?!), LA only has Kirk Gibson and San Fran only has Steroid Boy, their extensive history was in New York. Detroit has the distinction of the worst record in baseball. Oakland would be a good pick, but shame on you people for not picking Atlanta. Despite my hatred towards that team (represent METS!), they are the most recognizable NL team because of what they've accomplished since 1989.
2007-05-02 16:38:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by rockbigmoney2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Order
1. St. Louis- baseball is life their
2. Boston- no one complains more than them
3. Baltimore- passionate, supportive fans who have had bad years since Cal retired
4. Detroit- put up with their teams when they were bad
5. New York- wouldn't be able to complainabout cross town rival if their was still a team
2007-05-02 17:03:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by wiz and skinz fan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll Have to agree, somewhat, mines are:
1. New York
2. Chicago
3. Boston
4. St. Louis
5.Detroit
If you wanted Top 10 then:
6. Pittsburgh
7. LA
8. San Fran
9. Baltimore
10. Cleveland
2007-05-02 16:36:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by eli 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boston, Noo Yawk, Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis. Each, at one time in the past or continuing today, was home to two teams (three in NY) with enough success (ticket sales) to stay in place for at least five decades. And the love of baseball in each city continues strongly today, with unbelievably enthusiastic (in some cases, deranged) fandom ready to cheer or criticize.
2007-05-02 16:55:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree w/ all your cities except la. maybe replace la w/ like atlanta or pitt. like someone mentioned above, la doesn't care if they have a team or not and i live in la. i've been to home games in ny, sf, oak, sd, anaheim, sea, & arlington(tx) and chavez rivine(la) was the only stadium where about 40% of the fans show up to the game in the 2nd/3rd inning and leave before the 8th. anaheim is a lil better but at chavez rivine, the ppl seem like they are there to kill time or to have a family night out, rather than being there to support their team. last year when the dodgers didnt have their names on the back, i've heard quite a few fans rooting for a player by their number like
"c'mon #3, hit that ball out of the park"
had to break it to him that cesar izturis doesn't take too many pitches deep.
2007-05-02 16:49:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by jayz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
New York. Boston. Chicago. St. Louis. Philadelphia. If Los Angeles lost its team, it would take them five years to notice.
2007-05-02 16:31:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. New York
2. Boston
3. Chicago
4. LA
5. Detroit
2007-05-02 16:51:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
New York
St Louis
Chicago
Boston
Cleveland
2007-05-02 16:36:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by lorem_ipsum 3
·
0⤊
1⤋