What is everyone's opinion????? I think Bush has a lot more moral character. If you are a hippy liberal plz don't give you bullSh*t comments...........
2007-05-02 08:44:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Alice is scary, "i personally believe Clinton was the better president because at the time we had absolutely no national debt (now it is in the trillions) and we had many national programs to help people out."
We had 0 national debt? Alice, pass the bong. It rose from 1982 through 1997, slightly dipped and rose again. We've had national debt since at least 1900 (really always, but the chart only goes to 1900)
Contrary to popular belief, we also had wars: Kosovo, Bosnia, Iraq, Haiti. We bombed people such as Africans and Chinese. The budget was balanced 2/8 yrs, that was good and distinguishable from now. We were attacked by Al qeada multiple times and thousands died and were injured. Gas prices rose at points in the 1990s, unemployment was higher. The stock market soared, then crashed; real estate the same in some places. Our president was similarly hated by some, albeit perhaps less, and protested when he went to other nations. His foreign policy decisions were not universally accepted, and lying about a BJ was the least worst thing he did.
2007-05-02 11:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Tired o 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could desire to respond to this question in my own words, even with the undeniable fact that it could basically finally end up being a miles less eloquently phrased attempt to assist what Wayne pronounced ("the two lied, the two cheated..."). right here is why i'm answering: JDW1, you're able to be between the main ignorant human beings I even have ever come for the time of. you're perfect once you pronounced that Clinton did not something while the WTC became into bombed. that could desire to have something to do with the undeniable fact that he had not been president for almost a three hundred and sixty 5 days by using then. Bush led to greater harmless American deaths than Clinton, hands down. The conflict in Iraq has led to the loss of life of 1000's, and what have we to coach for it? A captured and extremely disgruntled Saddam Hussein, who, nonetheless a heinous chief, had not something to do with 9/11. someplace Bin weighted down is giggling and cheering: "Jeb Bush in '08!"
2016-10-14 09:13:12 · answer #2 · answered by emanus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess Bush does have more "moral"character and is probably a more likeable person b/c he seems more like the average guy. But in my OPINION Bill Clinton was a better leader. I'd rather have a someone who's a better leader than someone who's likeable and has "moral" character. Personally I don't give a shiit what one does in their own privacy as long as it doesn't effect the job they are doing for the american people. If you do a good job at running this country then who cares if you let a fat chick blow you and smoked some weed once. It should be more about leadership and not character. So my vote is Bill Clinton.
If this question was about Hilary then I dunno, she's kind fo a biitch but if she does a good job then I don't care.
2007-05-02 08:54:33 · answer #3 · answered by Sav 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
So you want to hear only what YOU want to hear. Is it that you can't stand the truth? Liars come in all shapes and sizes. The worst kind of liars are those who claim to be Christians. Christians follow the 10 Commandments God gave Moses yet they lie and lie and lie. Clinton basically told one lie about not having sex with a bimbo. Bush lied about almost everything. No one was killed as a result of Clinton's lies. Thousands of lives are lost over a Bush lie.
This is not some hippy liberal BS it is fact. If you would wake up you would see that. But just by your question you don't want to see. You want to go through life with blinders on.
For the fact that we still have free speech, at least until Bush declares martial law and takes over as dictator, I will answer whateve question I want and do so how I want.
2007-05-02 08:59:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If you are only looking for answers from people who agree with you, then why ask the question? i personally believe Clinton was the better president because at the time we had absolutely no national debt (now it is in the trillions) and we had many national programs to help people out. Bush cares for the conservative christians and himself only.
2007-05-02 08:57:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Clinton and Monica in the oval office? Moral character? That's a laugh. I know, the libs don't want to talk about that. That's a private matter. It's ancient history. Well it DOES matter. It showed how morally bankrupt he is.
Bush, he may be stupid but he stands up for what he believes. I totally disagree with him on things like illegal immigration. I think he's crummy Mexican butt kisser but he stand up for his beliefs, no matter how destructive they are.
2007-05-02 08:53:50 · answer #6 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bush has got Clinton beat hands down!
2007-05-02 08:53:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush Facts
Mismanaged the war in Iraq
Tried to sell our ports to Darfur
Called the Constitution "just a piece of paper"
Stated he "isn't very concerned with finding Bin Ladin"
Clinton facts
He got a ********
all opinions aside.. like my opinion of the war in Iraq being pointless... Clinton wins hand down in the moral fiber contest.. the biggest question though is why do you care?? was he so good or is Bush so lacking by comparison that you still feel you have to rip on Clinton 6 years later? move on.
2007-05-02 08:53:19 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 4⤊ 6⤋
I agree that Bush has more moral character....In every other aspect of being a president, Clinton was better.
2007-05-02 08:50:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Bush by far.
=
2007-05-02 08:50:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋