Why is that - are they just biased, or what?
I mean, if Reagan was such an evil guy (and, believe me, if you weren't around or paying attention when he was in office, the left-wingers were screaming and shouting just as loud then as they are now about Bush) and it was going to take decades to undo the "damage" he'd done, how come Clinton's tenure was marked by the lefties telling us non-stop how wonderful everything was? Heck, they're STILL telling us about the halcyon days of the Roaring '90s.
Do you suppose that if the next president is from the Democrat Party that the lefties, after a period of adjustment during which they'll still be foaming at the mouth about Bush (even though he'll be history at that point), will go back to telling us what a wonderful world we once again live in?
Are they really that predictable? I think they are.
2007-05-02
07:16:21
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
It will be difficult, more dangerous, and repulsive to establish an administration more corrupt than this one.
2007-05-02 07:28:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Don W 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
actually the damage done or rather started during the reagan years has still not been undone.
consider that in 1980 america produced more finished products (that would be built right here in factories in america) and exported them to markets around the world than any other nation at that time.
i think we all know exactly what has taken place since then.
but don't bother the kkkons with facts, they are too busy repeating talking points word for word and just wishing that they could kick some hippy butt.
no one seems to have told them the the hippies have been gone since 1969.
but then again, a kkkon who is living in the past as recent as 1969 is considered a 'lib' at the white sheet meetings...
2007-05-02 09:54:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
CORRECTION, the congress will tell you that.........
Why, because they have the power and control of your money and your laws, the presidents role is just a payback position to the big money people for helping them win a majority in congress, in the big scheme of ruining AMerica, Congress is where it is at.
Whatever a term limited person in the WH can do can be undone very shortly by Congress, but whatever a Congress does will not be undone for fourty or fifty years, that is 40 or 50 for those who do not read well. What it means is CONGRESS IS THE MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO AMERICAS FREEDOM TODAY.
UNTIL WE HAVE TERM LIMITS, OUR FREEDOMS ARE AT RISK EVERYDAY.
and it appears that with the exception of my friend with the pointy finger, there nothing but little commies answering this question.
2007-05-02 13:22:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
certain. because Democrats not in any respect do this, excellent? operating example: Frank likes to ignore that he develop into in cost of the banking marketplace at the same time as it develop into going abdomen up. And that he instructed us there develop into no mission. Clinton not in any respect reported that blue gown or that cigar. Pelosi not in any respect reported that a significant fruit producer in her district were given an exemption from the minimum salary develop. Kerry not in any respect mentions that his heroic vietnam service amounted to 4 months. Barry not in any respect mentions Rev. Wright. And Kennedy not in any respect reported Chapaquitic. Yeah. Dems are organic because the pushed snow, are not they?
2016-11-24 21:01:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually it was moderates who appreciated Clinton so much. A reasonable guy who brought us 8 years of peace and prosperity, reduced our indebtedness to Japan, balanced the budget, foiled terrorist plots, was instrumental in bringing peace to Ireland after 60 years of terrorism, talked back to the tobacco industry - seemingly without really trying.
Is it any wonder that his approval rating continued at 60% even while conservatives were trying to impeach.
They didn't fool the us.
By the way, I don't think 'lib-stalk' knows that China now has most-favored trading status with the U.S.
2007-05-02 07:29:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by p v 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that they are predictable too, and I don't think it's possible to undo the damage done by Democrats because it's usually something cataclysmic. Jimmy Carter firing all the CIA assets in Iran and bringing the Ayatolla back from exile in France because "he's a holy man" is haunting us to this day, and Bill Clinton giving away guided missile technology to the Chinese has resulted in them being able to shoot down satellites with ground-based missiles, which allows them to take out military and communications satellites at will. How do you unring those bells?
2007-05-02 07:24:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by libstalker 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Don't kid yourself, if this site is any indication people like yourself are just as obnoxious and whiny as any liberals ever were. Extremists from the left and right have that in common. They always point fingers and whine about things that aren't going their way.
2007-05-02 07:21:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You ask... are they just biased or what? Then proceed to tell us how predictable we are. Well I would say you are definitely already biased.. regardless if Dems or republicans get elected next year you seem to already have your mind made up.
2007-05-02 07:28:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Me 7
·
1⤊
1⤋