English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have read, heard, discussed, etc, the conspiracy that our government planned the attacks of 911. I've watched Loose Change and all the other videos that are on the web.

I dont know what to think, just to get that straight. I am neither for or against any idea of who did it.

But, ive heard that our government and the elite class of people are going after world domination and one world government. Ive heard that this whole Iraq war is to clear a path for oil or something.

I also heard that they proved that the whole Loose Change video was proven false. But i also heard that these experts in the areas of engineering, science, and government had changed their positions on the whole thing shortly after the attacks to due goverment interference.

What are your thoughts?

2007-05-02 06:27:43 · 16 answers · asked by Mike G 4 in News & Events Current Events

by the way, i just want to hear what you think about all this. I am not saying i believe the government did this. I have really have no idea who did it. but i just want to hear your thoughts. thanks

2007-05-02 06:49:28 · update #1

16 answers

The thing that people need to first ask themselves is "Is it within the realm of possibilities?" Could the government ever, or HAS the government ever, created an incident or allowed an incident to happen that rallied the citizens around the country and gave politicians the ability to go to war. Declaring war without public support is next to impossible.
There is a commonly referenced PNAC document published in September of 2000. Exactly 1 year before 9/11. It was a who's who of Military strategist called Rebuilding America's Defenses. It examined the effects of The U.S.'s current situation of being the last remaining Superpower and the effects of a Unipolar world. The problem with this is the lack of a perceived enemy, like during the cold war, and what that would do to military funding. The line that is referenced goes like this "Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor."
By itself, it doesn't seem like much, however if put in perspective by analyzing our country's past war declarations and the reasons or catalysts for them. We don't have great track record in this area. The PNAC document built on Dick Cheney's years as Secretary of Defense.
In 1846 - The Mexican American War - This was the time of Manifest destiny (God ordained this as "White Mans Land" from coast to coast. Settlers were offered land and citizenship in Tejas, Mexican territory. They accepted but had an uprising where the Mexican Army was sent in. James K. Polk said "American blood has been shed on American Soil" and proceeded to send the US Army into Mexico. (They were Mexican citizens in Mexican Territory) And that is how we got Arizona, new Mexico, Texas and California.
In 1898 - The Spanish American War -Teddy Roosevelt and the Rough Riders. They used the guise of the Battleship Main blowing up in Havana harbor. They incited the country by blaming it on the Spanish "Remember the Main!" was the war cry. So we went into Cuba and seized the sugar fields for US companies and also got the Philippines, Guam etc from it. It was later retracted and listed as a coal bunker explosion. We installed a corrupt puppet government which resulted in Castro Coming to power and proclaiming "this time we will be invited to the Revolution!"
Then in 1941 we delayed the acceptance of the declaration of war from Japan, resulting in the catastrophic Pearl harbor attack which infuriated the US public and got us into WWII. Then we have 9/11..and so on. So although I am not a full fledged conspiracy theorist I do see the pattern.
every major conflict we have been in have been instigated and incited through false information and created incidences, and now we have E.Howard Hunts revelation on the JFK assasination and our governments role.And the assasination was to keep us in Vietnam, another war.
E. Howard scribbled the initials "LBJ," standing for Kennedy's ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under "LBJ," connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that's never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer's name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer's name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales' name, with a line, the framed words "French Gunman Grassy Knoll."

2007-05-02 23:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by Myles D 6 · 3 1

I think there are a lot of idiots on both sides and you should listen to people who know what they are talking about. Looses change is half baked. But 911 was an inside job look at more credible sources. Also look at the fact the the people who claim to be able to debunk it all refuse to have a debate with physicists and other professions.

I don't know about the rest of you but I made some good investments and had a lot of free time the last few years. I have spent hundreds of hours studying and researching both sides only to find the official story a complete joke. There is no particular theory I like, but I am convinced beyond a reason of doubt that what we were told is horse ****, respectively.

2007-05-02 07:43:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

I smell a rotten egg in WTC building 7 and the smell of it just won’t go away.
I approached the so called “ WTC conspiracy theory” with considerable skepticism.
I have studied both sides of the issue extensively.
I have never seen airliners full of fuel smash into sky scrapers before so in regards to the towers proper and the way they came down I have no official opinion.
WTC 7 is the third concrete and steel high rise building to collapse from heat generated by fire in history and there has been several massive fires in these types of structures. The towers were the other two.
WTC 7 collapsed uniformly in 7 seconds.
Damage to 7 was a bite some 30 feet deep out of one corner and isolated fires dispersed in 2 or 3 floors on the side nearest to impact of debris from the collapse of the towers. .
It fell perfectly and monolithically into its foot print at near free fall.
The owner of the WTC complex “Larry Silverstien” acquired the complex months before 9/11, reinsured it at a higher premium, and announced that WTC was to be “pulled” 6 hours after the 9/11 attack and profited billions from insurance in the course of events. Latter he recanted indicating that what he met by “pulled” was that fire fighters should be pulled from the building in anticipation of a potential collapse.
Architects , physicists , and engineers find the official story to be implausible.
When put to the task of supporting official theory they are only able to replace former implausible theories with new implausible theories.

2007-05-02 07:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 7 2

I don't know, but I don't trust what has been officially put out. Time will tell. I find it sad that people are reduced to childish name calling if someone has the audacity to have an opinion that's different. I just pray that Allah (SWT) gives EVERYONE responsible for that crime a painful, tormenting punishment lasting as long as it takes to get the truth. Even if we find out the truth on Judgment Day, punish them from 11 SEP 2001 until Judgment Day.

2007-05-02 06:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by سيف الله بطل ‎جهاد‎ 6 · 7 0

In Detroit in 2000 a gasoline tanker truck exploded on the elevated overpass exit ramp from I-75 to I-94. Also the explosion of a gasoline tanker truck will leave a big crater in the highway.
http://www.greatdreams.com/homeland-security.htm
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051124/NEWS12/51124008

A gasoline tanker crashed and burst into flames near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge creating such intense heat that a stretch of highway melted and collapsed.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/29/highway.collapse.ap/index.html

It may not seem that burning gasoline is so hot but burning gasoline has a temperature above 1500° E (945° C). Therefore, it can heat objects in the fire area above its ignition temperature.
http://www.columbusfire.net/fire/gasoline.shtml

Steel is not an element. It is a compound. The melting point of steel depends on the mixture of the elements it contains.

Iron (Fe) is an element that is the main component of steel. The "melting point" of iron is
1535.0 °C (1808.15 K, 2795.0 °F)
http://www.chemicalelements.com/elements/fe.html

Steel is an alloy comprised mostly of iron, with a carbon content between 0.02 % and 1.7 % by weight, depending on grade. Carbon is the most cost-effective alloying material for iron, but various other alloying elements are used such as manganese and tungsten.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel

At what temperature does a floor truss begin to sag if it is not coated in fire-resistant insulation? How hot can a fire burn if it is well (very well) ventilated? 1000 degrees F? 2000 degrees F? According to NASA jet fuel CAN burn as hot as 3000 degrees F. See this video to understand how the WTC tower 1 and 2 collapsed...the drywall was the "inside agent"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Sa0u3XAYkIs

The high temperatures of the burning jet fuel, steel, plastics and other components made the whole area intensely hot and structures nearby were irrepairably damaged (building 7).
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XImQ6a-VrnA&mode=related&search=

Larry Silversteing, building owner and FDNY pulled building 7.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs

Rosie O'Donnell will be leaving "The View" in June. Rosie O'Donnell used emotion to obfuscate fact and her celebrity status to rally people to impeach President Bush. On "The View " Rosie O'Donnell adamantly declared that, "it was the first time in history that fire melted steel' (in building 7 of WTC).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba6j2k6wzdQ&mode=related&search=.

She begins her tirade with, "Historically have governments ever faked incidents or incited incidents to get them into war."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fPtEQk0k3YI

2007-05-02 06:44:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Though I choose not to believe any of the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11. It wouldn't surprise me if many were proven true based on other coruptions of this administration.

2007-05-02 06:37:40 · answer #6 · answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5 · 3 1

There are people called terrorists. They do some really bad things. The 911 thing was really low. They did it. They do a lot of nasty things. Just ask the citizens of the middle east.

The US government had enough stuff on their plate without that sort of thing.

Just because someone says something, especially on the internet, making a video or whatever, does not mean that it's the truth.

2007-05-02 06:39:55 · answer #7 · answered by kiwi 7 · 2 6

Anyone that is in disbelief. Please please contact me. I will send you some of the best info you can find. There is so much misinformation it is a sea of crap. I have spent 200 hours researching this. Let me give you a few hours of great info that took me hundreds of hours to compile.

2007-05-02 08:36:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I don't believe our government did it, but i do believe they looked the other way and allowed it to happen.

2007-05-02 06:51:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Sorry .. Our goverment is not that organized to plan and then pull off such a horrific event ...and then keep it all secret .
The involved parties would be racing to sell their 'insider stories ' to the STAR , GLOBE and Washington Post for all of us to look at as we stand in the check out counters of our super markets .
As for changing stories due to government interference .... the ACLU would be drooling to get their grimy little hands on one of those victims.
Just think about it ...Your the President of the USA ..your hanging out in the oval office and say ..Hey guys how about we fly a few planes into the world trade center building ... and your vip pals say ..Wow great idea ...Why didn't we think of that !.. and you shout ..Because I'm President ! .. Okay go out and hire a few guys and have them sign up for flight lesson right away ... Okay lets go ... this will be great . Oh ya .almost forgot ... heres some cash from the Congress to set it up ...don't tell Polocy , she'll make a stink ! ... . and remember to have everbody who survives get arrest .. Okay boss ..will do . As the vips walk out ..Oh by the way ..why are we doing this ? ... and you say ..so I can start a war in the Middle East... and the vips say okay ... and as they walk out of the Oval Office ..one of them says to another ...How much will it cost to pay off Osama Bin Laden to confess worldwide that he set it all up ? Oh don't worry about that ...bin owes us one since he blow up the trade center the first time ...he'll get a kick out of it !! .. Hey did anyone turn off that damn tape recorder in the Oval office before we discussed this .. Hell ... I don't think so !! and that intern ... whats her name ? she was in their taking notes and talking to her friend on a cell phone !! Don't worry ..we'll put goverment pressure on her and her friend to keep their mouths shout like Bill Clinton did to that other inter ... whats her name ... ?

2007-05-02 07:41:58 · answer #10 · answered by Rocky 2 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers