English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is George W. Bush so successful, honest, awesome, compassionate and caring, and why does he love the United States of America.

2007-05-02 06:17:28 · 36 answers · asked by Jody C 1 in Politics & Government Politics

I am NOT being sarcastic and I am NOT on drugs. I am a lady who is speaking THE TRUTH about George W. Bush and I can see that many of you CANNOT HANDLE THE TRUTH.

2007-05-02 06:32:43 · update #1

36 answers

Thank you for that. It is because he is has commited himself to those values. He does not sway at criticism when he knows the right thing to do. As hami-sama once said: " Stand up for what you think is right, even if you're standing alone." Have a great day, Go BUSH!

2007-05-03 01:42:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Actually he loves money not the USA.
And here is how it workes!
My father explained this to me years ago, and it made perfect sense.
Lets say you were president and you wanted to make some money lotts of money ! and you did not care who got hurt or killed in the process.
So you start a war! a war is a great money maker because the war will need supplies ,bullets , tanks, airplains, food , (gasoline) bombs, lots of stuff.
Allright we have now convinced the taxpayers that this is a just war, and they are more than happey to pay for it with their hard earned tax dollars, they feel that this must be better than wasting there money on something like health care or social security! haha.
So now its time to order up some airplanes, lets say $25,000,000 worth, these are expensive!
Who can we get to build them? or who should we give the contract to?
Well If you wanted to make some money you could award the contract to the highest bidder, just as long as they were willing to lets say donate some money to the right cause (the George W, Bush fund! ).
You see its all buisness, and big corporations are the ones calling the shots not the president, he is just the middleman they need to go through to get to the taxpayers money!
Its just a shame someone has to die to make the whole thing work!
I hpoe this answered your question
Thanks have a nice day!

2007-05-02 06:45:41 · answer #2 · answered by Sean D 1 · 2 2

Yeah, he's just the best, isn't he....What neo-con BS are you reading and being brainwashed by? Bill O'Rielly or something. WAKE UP!!! The Republicans and Democrats are owned and controlled by the same people. There's no left/right paradime. It's about freedom or tyranny. You choose. GWB is on the brink of bringing this country to bankruptcy and already charging ahead with the North American Union.

2007-05-02 06:23:11 · answer #3 · answered by Ted S 4 · 2 3

In recent months, Republicans have begun to discover that their leader is not the paragon they once thought he was.

Perhaps he is not a conservative at all but a deficit-mongering big-government advocate, a world-changing radical in disguise and a cultivator of global anti-Americanism. Perhaps, from Baghdad to Kabul to New Orleans, bungling is not the exception but the rule because he and his inner circle hold planning, the law, diplomacy and even reason in contempt.

Suddenly, Republicans as well as Democrats are urging the defenestration of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld — the Titanic chair-shifter's way of acknowledging a fiasco in Iraq. George Will savaged President Bush for a "triumph of unrealism." Embattled Connecticut Republican Rep. Christopher Shays lurched from "stay the course" to "phased withdrawal."

Just last month, conservative talk-show host Joe Scarborough asked, "Is Bush an Idiot?" In May, the popular right-wing KABC-AM (790) talk-show host Doug McIntyre declared: "I was wrong to have voted for George W. Bush…. I have been shocked repeatedly by a consistent litany of excuses, alibis, doubletalk, inaccuracies, bogus predictions and flat-out lies…. After five years of carefully watching George W. Bush, I've reached the conclusion he's either grossly incompetent or a hand-puppet for a gaggle of detached theorists with their own private view of how the world works. Or both."

Such reconsiderations are all to the good, and not only for the practical purpose of evacuating a sinking ship. The recantation mood is a sign of maturity.

But apologies, while worthy, are never enough. To help make right what has gone badly wrong, they also must lead to rethinking.

Because 1930s analogies are back in vogue, consider that it was incumbent upon conservatives who were dismayed by Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938 to inquire into the worldview that led him to appease Adolf Hitler. Likewise, as conservatives never cease to remind those on the left, it was perfectly reasonable to tell the Soviet Union's fellow travelers to examine the fantastical credulity with which they persuaded themselves to overlook the depredations of Lenin and Stalin. To learn from our greatest misconceptions is, of course, a prime reason we study history.

So what lessons should Bush's partisans take from his decline? Where did they go wrong when they were cheering Bush, excoriating his adversaries and devoutly assuring the rest of us that he was, as former presidential speechwriter David Frum put it in an unabashed double entendre, "the right man"?

They're obliged to have to figure it out on their own. But let me offer this for their consideration: The core of the Bush problem is an extremist worldview. Bush's aggressive go-it-alone attitude kicked in long before 9/11. "You're either with us or you're with the terrorists" was just an extension of Bush's rejection of the Kyoto Protocol (the international global warming agreement) and the International Criminal Court.

Under Bush, reality had to be bulldozed into submission. Whatever went wrong in Iraq or Afghanistan, questioning Bush's narrow understanding of the Islamist danger amounted to appeasement, cutting and running, pining for defeat. Whatever the economic conditions, the remedies were privatization, deregulation and tax cuts for plutocrats. On every front, foreign and domestic, liberals were to blame.

This attitude didn't stop with Bush alone, and it persists unaltered. Just recently, in this spirit, an e-mail from Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman warned that Democratic victories in the midterm elections would mean "government by the far left," "weaken[ing] America" thus: "Impeachment. Cutting and running from the war on terror. Key defense systems dismantled. Tax cuts repealed. Speaker Pelosi."

The logic of this paranoid worldview is a deep and awful thing to confront. But confronting it is a matter of intellectual honesty.

Today, it's morally mandatory, a matter of intellectual decency, that Bush's erstwhile partisans rethink both their credulity and their ideology and ask how they could for so long have overlooked what now strikes them as obvious. "Whoops, sorry about that" and "mistakes were made" — love that passive voice — won't do

2007-05-02 06:26:05 · answer #4 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 2 2

No, dear..... YOU can't handle the truth OBVIOUSLY. You just continue to hide beneath that blanket of patriotism, honey, and everything will be alright.

Trust me. The truth about Dubya is scary.

EDIT: Sean D. (below me) has a very smart father.

2007-05-02 06:39:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Some got it and know what to do with it, and some got it and don't know what to do with it take Clinton for example, it was all between his legs and now we have Bush that has a head on his shoulders not between his legs.

2007-05-02 06:29:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Would somebody like to be a president these days?

2007-05-02 06:37:43 · answer #7 · answered by Dosage 3 · 2 0

?! what George w. bush are you thinking of !?

both of them are evil people (lol) wow you must have gotten hit in the head really hard huh? then you start watching the news while your head was hurting am i right?

2007-05-02 06:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Your opinions are either sarcastic or they testify to the power of money and family connections. Bush has none of those qualities.

2007-05-02 06:21:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

You tell the truth as you see it, not as it is, like all of us

2007-05-02 07:16:30 · answer #10 · answered by jean 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers