English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the treaty was signed in 2005 the spp security and prosperity partnership of north america canada us and mexico are already one. its to help against terrorism .

2007-05-02 01:42:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

first off there here what - ILLEGALLY!!!
then you me and the rest of the USA is paying to house them, feed them , give them medical care, schooling.. you don't honestly have a problem paying higher taxes to do all that ??

2007-05-02 01:48:10 · answer #1 · answered by Rumisha R 3 · 1 0

For starters, immigration law violators are not immigrants. They are aliens who are in the US in violation of law. There is a big difference between individuals who apply for admission and fulfill all the requirements necessary for admission and those that intentionally overstay a visa or enter the US illegally without application. One of the unstated problems of bypassing application is the health issue. All applicants are screened for communicable disease before being allowed to enter. By bypassing this and sneaking into the US infectious disease screening is bypassed as well.
The real problems are much greater than that though. One problem is in health care. As an example, the Los Angeles public health care system is on life support and failing. 60% of the counties uninsured patients are not US citizens and more than half are here illegally. They are crowding emergency rooms because they have no insurance or money for a doctor. The National Research Council estimates that the cost to California is 3 billion $ a year and in the US as much as 22 billion $ annually. The average illegal has 4-6 children of school age in their family. The cost of educating each child is 7,000 $ and is padi for with your tax dollars. With an estimated 10 million illegals in the US, you can do the math and see what that is costing legal tax paying citizens each year. Taht is just a drop in the bucket when you start to look at other issues such as car theft, smuggling, drug trafficing, human trafficing , drive by gang shootings, ect.
The reason Mexicans are highlighted is that 70% of the illegals in the US come from Mexico.For this reason, teachers are forced to speak spanish as a second language in some areas, phone and public services are bilingual, and people are being training in secondary language to accomadate the law breakers. Does this makes sense? The real impact of not enforcing the immigration laws in this country is immense and immeasurable.

2007-05-02 02:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by booman17 7 · 0 0

The problem is severalfold:

1) The issues of national security because of our porous borders.

2) The issues of welfare and support as mandated by (I think) the 13th, 14th, and/or 15th Amendment to the Constitution--which guarantees the same rights to anyone inside the country's borders as the citizens in the borders.

3) The proglem of people using #1 to force their agenda because of the fear of #2.

Hey, 1 and 2 are legitimate (3 is not). The answer to #2 is a fiscal one (money) and the answer to #1 is an operational one (put up a wall know who is coming and going).

I'm in favor of a wall with open doors. Know who is coming and going. Take care of them while they are here.

Man, that almost sounds liberal... so unlike me. Well, that's what I think on that subject.

2007-05-02 02:14:24 · answer #3 · answered by Paul McDonald 6 · 0 0

This nation has about 200 or more million people more then it as a union and the land can accomodate. I ask illegals to return to their land in the namesake of my savior, my brother Christ, but if they are not christian and do not leave as asked, then I ask God to desolate them.
I have a sister who raised 6 kids without welfare mostly as a single parent, her reason, she did say she wanted to make a good work ethic in them and not promote seeking hand outs.
She has bad teeth and cannot get any help for them because the illegals consume the services, and moreover, many the jobs the illegals take are jobs we would be working if they were not taking them and this harms us, it makes us lazy, they laugh at us, they say we need them and them is not us, I am for strict enforcement of laws against them, I am for stricter laws, laws to physically punish them, I advocate the end of citizenship for children of illegals born in the USA and a barring and banning of their citizenship all their generation, I advocate DNA recording the transgressor, I advocate one time transgression forgiveness and a sure lecture of punitives if they commit second transgression.
I dont blame the Mexican government save for the conditions in Mexico that drive her citizens north, it is a failure of our leaders to see to it that enforcement is against these transgressions a sure force, deadly if necessary.

2007-05-02 02:06:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Maybe the big deal is that they're breaking the law. These people are not citizens yet they break the law and they almost get rewarded for it. If you, as a citizen, break the law you'll get punished. Why would treat non-citizens who haven't earned the right to be here better than those who are here legally? It doesn't make any sense.

2007-05-02 02:21:14 · answer #5 · answered by southfloridamullets 4 · 0 0

the super Deal is illegitimate, criminal. we are a rustic of rules, yet in basic terms those we elect to enforce, that's a shame for the government and regulation enforcement. there is no racial phobias. The specifically Mexican unlawful immigrants are allowed to be utilized via our government and Vicente Fox for much less high priced hard artwork. the answer to this situation is easy; all people who hire unlawful immigrants would desire to take their businesses, families and their illegals and their families and bypass to MEXICO. We in basic terms elect criminal American taxpayers in our u . s .. If a Mexican or different nationaly elect to return to our u . s ., then they might desire to first study english, then bypass by our immigration device to alter into leagalized electorate. At this type of time that this might happen, usa might welcome them as their maximum modern electorate.

2017-01-09 07:39:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

we used to call them illegal aliens, or just aliens... every other county in the world still does. NOBODY calls them illegal immigrants. Only the USA.
Illegal immigrants (aliens) in Mexico cannot send their kids to public school - it is only for citizens. In the U.S., illegals send their kids to school - and since they are illegal, they do not pay taxes to pay the teachers. So who pays? WE pay.

In Mexico, you pay BEFORE you get treated in the hospital. The illegal immigrants (ALIENS) go to the hospital, but usually don't have money, so they cannot pay, but U.S. law says the hospital MUST treat them..... so who pays? WE pay, because the hospitals charge paying customers more, to make up for their loss. Dozens of hospitals close to the Mexican border have gone out of business because they lose too much money treating illegals.
- they are illegal, thus they are not legal. We did not invite them here, but they are here. How would you feel if people broke into your house, ate your food, used your bathroom, your phone, made a mess, and then said they will not leave??? What if they are homeless? What if they are hungry? They NEED (want?) what you got, but who invited them? not you. so you call the police to make them leave. But they say "we are only trying to feed our families - why are you being racist?" You have more than them, but do you owe strangers, just because you are slightly richer than them?

El Salvadorans leave low paying jobs ($100/month) in El Salvador to go to Mexico to work, to make more money.
Mexicans leave low paying jobs ($300/month) in Mexico to go to the USA to make MORE money.

Who says that illegals do the jobs Americans won't do? President Bush. There is a minimum wage in America, except for illegals. Who decides to pay agriculture workers so little? Big business.

*** As soon as an illegal becomes legal, he will not pick fruit/vegetables ever again. Then who will do this work? MORE illegals!!!!! The answer is not to exploit Mexicans, the answer is to pay real money to fruit pickers, so that Americans will do this work. The current system is not sustainable.....

That's the big deal.

2007-05-02 02:06:07 · answer #7 · answered by Tokyo Rose 1 · 2 0

What? A treaty on national security? Between nations? That's odd.

2007-05-02 01:45:21 · answer #8 · answered by vendetta4hire 3 · 1 0

They are just felons-no big deal.
The goal of SPP is consolidation of power and trumping of our constitution. Big business wins and we get screwed.

2007-05-02 02:24:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the problem is the are get you medical and other benefits that tax our system that the only problem!!!

2007-05-02 01:47:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers