"has eaten"
2007-05-01 23:44:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by cowboydoc 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The past tense of to eat has been used as "et" in Edwardian times. It is now non-new, and phased out of general usage.
2007-05-02 08:01:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by phoenixfinca 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No longer. Although some people still use it, you would not be considered "correct" to do so, instead "has/was eaten" or "ate" are considered the only appropriate forms.
2007-05-02 10:42:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ghede 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
eaten is the other past tense for of eat. et is latin for 'and.'
2007-05-02 06:52:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matthew P 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
nah,et is french word meaning and
2007-05-02 07:16:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by the crab 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, where did you get that from?
2007-05-02 06:48:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by miss_gem_01 6
·
0⤊
1⤋