is America drawing itself to a Waterloo situation by attacking Iran?

Question

Americans wil find themselves in Waterloo like situation if they attack Iran.It is unfortunate that the American leaders for the past decades have tried very hard to impose their ideas and rulings on third world countries including Iran.I am sure this time America will not succeed any longer and instead find itself in a situation that has no other option that to retreat!so my advice to Mr. Bush is dont create another shameful situation for Americans and let us live at peace and try fight our common enimies such as deceases and other destructive elements which hurting human beings together.Let other smaller and weaker nations also taste their own free society without interferance of super power.I hope and pray that there be no other war and bloodshed ever happen in Iran................

Answer 1

An attack on Iran isn't coming; and it wouldn't be a Waterloo even if it did happen.

Answer 2

Bush is waiting for the return of the Christ. Iraq is formally known as the 'Garden of Eden'. He has taken that back from the Muslims. Now he needs a landing site for the Christ Mobile. I guess that is Iran or maybe Israel???

Not a Waterloo situation, but perhaps an alien invasion is on the way (real or fake). If the Christ comes from the Heavens, will a space-fleet arsenal be far behind??

Answer 3

what i find funny is how in every situation if a person is given a choice to live in a dictatorship or a democracy everyone says democracy...but the Muslim leaders in the middle east hate democracy because it take power away from them and gives it to the people...

Answer 4

Waterloo was a win for the Brits..it was the French that lost...we aint french

Answer 5

i'd call for help, it really is the purely mission, sorry. Bears run swifter than human beings, and they climb swifter too, no longer to teach I actually have short legs. do not imagine i can outrun a submit to.

Answer 6

You talk a good line. You should run for political office in Iran. I am sure that you would do well.

IF the US does attack Iran because Iran refuses to stop uranium enrichment and allow IAEA inspectors to oversee the process, obviously, Iran will defend itself and counter attack. However US and its allies have by far more miltary might.

For a country of its size, Iran has a formidable military.
http://www.globalfirepower.com/country_detail.asp?country_id=25

Under the "divinely guided" leadership of their commander-in-chief- and Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, the Islamic Republic of Iran has two kinds of armed forces: the regular forces and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), totalling about 545,000 personnel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran/Military...

Military branches:
Islamic Republic of Iran Regular Forces (Artesh): Ground Forces, Navy, Air Force (Niruye Havayi Jomhuriye Islamiye Iran; includes air defense); Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (Sepah-e Pasdaran-e Enqelab-e Eslami, IRGC): Ground Forces, Navy, Air Force, Qods Force (special operations), and Basij Force (Popular Mobilization Army); Law Enforcement Forces (2007)
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ir.html#Military
http://www.iiss.org/index.asp?pgid=7026

The Shahab-3, Fajr-5 and Zelzel missiles are among the effective weapons in their arsenal (aside from the soldiers who are willing to be martyrs).
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2007/iran-070121-rferl01.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/weapons.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/index.html

Iran's Shahab-3 ballistic missiles are capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and can be detonated by a remote-control device while still in high-altitude flight as electromagnetic pulse weapons - even one of which could knock out America's critical electrical and technological infrastructure, effectively sending the continental U.S. back to the 19th century with a recovery time of months or years. Iran will have that capability – at least theoretically – as soon as it has one nuclear bomb ready to arm such a missile
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43956

Russia delivered to Iran 29 TOR-M1 (SA-15) surface to air missile systems designed to bring down aircraft and guided missiles at low altitudes.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/international/318977/iran_buys_russian_surface_to_air_missiles_paper/index.html
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/01/25/Worldandnation/Russia_delivers_air_d.shtml

Iran may also have Russia's S-300SP surface-to-air missile system, capable of shooting down targets some 90 miles away.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192686,00.html

Iran's stealth drone
http://www.iranmilitaryforum.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=150&Itemid=54
http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n105439

Iran's key nuclear sites.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4617398.stm

In addition to the British frigate HMS Cornwall, there is a multi-national strike force in the Persian Gulf. Furthermore, there are British naval vessels stationed at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean. The British Royal Navy may take action with its Special Boat Service (SBS) , the British Royal Navy's special forces unit. The service's motto is "By Strength and Guile". It forms part of the United Kingdom Special Forces, alongside the Special Air Service (SAS), Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR), and Special Forces Support Group (SFSG).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Boat_Service

Ready to assist are the American aircraft carrier strike group aircraft carrier CVN-73 USS John C. Stennis (deployed January 20) and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force beth are in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf. A 3rd carrier group, the CVN-68 USS Nimitz (deployed March 30) was scheduled for its WESTPAC07 deployment to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower which is now going back to the US. It was deployed December 2006.
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1265
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/batgru-68.htm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070330/pl_afp/usmilitaryirannavy_070330160111;_ylt=Annlx2.rLEDDrJgz9RYaNIcUewgF

Amphibious ready group LHD-5 Bataan ( USS Oak Hill, USS Shreveport). In carrying out its primary mission, BATAAN would transport and land ashore not only troops, but also the tanks, trucks and other vehicles, artillery, ammunition, and complete supplies necessary to fully support the assault. LHD-5's armament system includes the NATO Sea Sparrow Surface Missile System (NSSMS) for antiair warfare protection, two Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) Systems and two Phalanx Close-in Weapon System (CIWS) mounts to counter threats from low flying aircraft and close-in small craft. Six missile decoy launchers augment LHD-5's antiship missile defenses. LDH-5 was scheduled back on April 4 and was evidently kept in the Persian Gulf due to circumstances in the area.
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1265
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/lhd-5.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/marg.htm

More details about military options can be found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm

On Tuesday, March 27, 2007, the two US strike groups, USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the USS Stennis, along with guided-missile cruiser USS Antietam, conducted military exercises in the Persian Gulf. The participants included 15 warships and more than 100 aircraft..

Each carrier carries an air wing of F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet fighter-bombers, EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare aircraft, S-3 Viking refueling and anti-submarine planes, and E-2C Hawkeye airborne command-and-control aircraft.

Also taking part were six guided-missile destroyers, the Anzio, Ramage, O'Kane, Mason, Preble and Nitze; the frigate Hawes; amphibious assault ships Boxer and Bataan; and the minesweepers Scout, Gladiator and Ardent.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2007-03/28/content_838185.htm

The Isfahan plant is above ground, but Natanz is more than 50ft below and would require either a tactical nuclear missile or a conventional bunker-buster bomb to destroy it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1753223,00.html.
.
.