Hmmm... did it occur to you that we live on this one, and why should I care if the other planets are heating up? Or are you trying to say that four planets of different sizes, atmospheres, and orbits could be scientifically compared to ours? If you do, you obviously got a "F" in science.
Could any one of you Global Warming deniers produce one article from a respected scientific publication that refutes Global Warming?
I didn't think so.
HEY schunkdafied -
First of all, it's "you're" not "your". Secondly, you didn't provide a link to an article that backs up your "theory". Why don't you try understanding what's going on rather than leaving "your" head shoved up "your"....
2007-05-01 19:15:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jason 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Man does not understand his solar system, or anything past his planet. Thus, it could be due to the other planet's lack of ozone or dog farts for all we know.
Man does not understand his planet, except in the short term, and even then it's sketchy.
You know, if the talk of Global Warming, real or not, gets more green energy around, I'm all for it.
I'd like to be able to look over the city of Los Angeles on a hot summer day and not have a brown cloud overhead.
I'd like to not hear about acid rain ever again, and how it's destroying statues.
I'd like to hear about how tropical coral reefs and ecosystem are flourishing.
I'd like to be able to drink water from a stream without worrying about E-Coli, Mercury, or whatever else goes in there.
I'd like to get US dependence of oil gone. Heck, if it moves to Brazil, that's a win-win situation. Less money for commercial AND military transportation.
I'd like to be able to walk down the street without coughing as the smoke billows from diesel engines, or mal-cared for engines.
At some point, the planet won't be able to support the population, even in the well-off countries. The green energy sources (some of them) generally lead to conservation of existing resources. I'd rather solve the resources problem now, rather than 50, 75, 100 years down the line, so my progeny can continue to live.
2007-05-01 18:45:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by K 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well--first of all Al Gore isn't a scientist--nor has he ever claimed to be--he only reports what scientists have found.
And if the ignorant nitwits who keep harping about global warming on other planets ever actually read the stories, they'd knnow this is old news. Scientists looked at that years ago. The result--which you would know IF you actually bothered to get the facts--is that about 15% of the global warming on Earth is due to natural causes--including shifts in solar radiation which are responsible for the warming on other planets. The other 85% is due to human CO2 emissions.
Like I said, its old news--been out there for years--as anyone who actually knows anything about science has been aware of.
2007-05-01 20:27:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hold on, I'm running my "Gore logic" program for your answer . . .
Got it. It says "Radiant Heat from the Earth. The other planets did not begin to heat up until the Earth did. Clearly the Earth must have caused it".
(I know, a "Gore Logic" program is an Oxymoron. But I bought it with Carbon credits, the same thing Gore buys his excuses with, and you get what you pay for!)
2007-05-01 18:55:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by freebird 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
HEY AFRO, your an idiot. You are a brainwashed walking liberal zombie. Temps change throughout time you know.....Did you know there was once an ice age? Darn that global warming. I am so sick of this nonsense. Yeah there is global warming who cares the earth changes some day it will get colder and then what.....turn of the freezers we are cooling the world.
2007-05-01 19:49:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"guy-made" worldwide warming. Your fact is sexist. you think of in undemanding terms "guy" could make worldwide warming? Oh so women human beings can not make worldwide warming yet of course the almighty "guy" can do it. recover from your sexism and you will see of course.
2016-10-14 08:04:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe your reasoning is why only 4% of your answers are chosen as the best ones....
2007-05-01 18:43:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Starred!
Yep. There is going to be egg on everyone's face this time next decade.
2007-05-01 18:48:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Maybe you're confusing causation with coincidence?
2007-05-01 18:48:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by hyungbinkim 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
They have not found anything just like LIberals have not found a soul in their puny little empty bodies. God Bless.
2007-05-01 18:42:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋