Matter is what should determine the ultimate fate of the universe. Mass has gravity, so the more mass there is the more gravity there will be. If there's enough mass in the universe it should some day stop expanding and collapse back on itself.
However, such doesn't seem to be what's actually going on since we now know that the universe is expanding *faster* rather than slowing down due to the presence of mass (..gravity..) Why this is so isn't known at this time.
All research, such as the WMAP program, strongly implies that the universe will continue to expand indefinitely.
As far as how long life as we know it will exist, that's hard to say since we have the capability to destroy all life on planet Earth. Another huge asteroid could come along and impact Earth, like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs and 60% of all life on Earth about 65-million years ago. Also, there's a star within 150 light years of Earth that could possibly go supernova and bathe Earth in deadly radiation (..http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2311..) Finally, the time will come in about 4-billion years when our Sun will become very unstable, expanding immensely and engulfing Mercury, Venus, and possibly Earth. At that time no life could continue here.
2007-05-01 17:22:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chug-a-Lug 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many different questions can you ask at one time?
1.
Life as we know it may cease to exist in the next 200-500 years if the hairless apes don't smarten up and stop defficating in their own food bowl.
2.
I take it you mean all forms of energy, not just radiation. And E still = MC^2
Matter would still "matter" more (see links).
There are stars as large as our solar system which contain and emit immense amounts of energy. Blackholes are a fraction of the size of Earth and can eat stars. Matter and the gravitiation force created will have more effect on the end of the universe than energy, though it is all about energy balance, since matter and energy are interchangeable..
The universe is accepted as being created in the Big Bang and if they ever figure out how to measure dark matter they expect to calculate that eventually the universe will collapse back on itself and create another Big Bang ad infinitum.
In other words, before the Big Bang ... there may have been a universe that was destroyed to create our universe. And in turn ours may end so that a new universe will be created.
2007-05-01 17:27:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Radiation is the more important.
Mass can only be used locally but radiation can gives us information from all parts of the universe.
Life could go on for billions of years on earth.
Intelligent,objective and technological life like man will probably be limited to 300 to 500 years.
The universe is a finite entity and one day it will go out of existence.
The actual mechanism of it's demise is probably progressive in the evolution of galaxies.
2007-05-02 00:16:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it really is precisely the position faith will develop right into a detriment to technological expertise, even as those of religion call for that questions be responded through technique of their faith and that medical analyze might want to provide up. At it will be middle, it really is taking applications of the logical fallacy of complicated the unexplained with the unexplanable. In different words, it assumes that when you think about that 40-60% of the universe is lacking that it is going to never be discovered. it receives taken slightly added and concludes that considering that the the 40-60% will through no skill be discovered, that it will be "info" that their faith (and maximum efficient their faith) is a person-pleasant reality. it really is one of those questioning that held back medical progression for therefore long. sense of the position we'd want to be if docs though held that disease is prompted through sin. the person-pleasant lifespan might want to though be 30 years, youngster mortality might want to be very intense, we'd want to struggle through from many better minor (and curable) ailments. Even the fundamentalists take skills of medical progression on some element.
2016-12-05 05:14:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋