Should the Democrats cut funding to end the war after bush rejected to let our brave troops return home safe?

Question

bush has made it absolutely clear that he hates the troops.

he actually vetoed a bill to END THE WAR

Can you believe this?

Well shouldnt the Democratic Majority reduce fuinding which will ensure the safe return of our American Soldiers fighting a war based on lies on both sides and more particularly the repulicans and bush?

PS: WE lost this war. What part of this is so hard for republican extremsit to understand and comprehend?


the republican post war had NO PLAN

The republican PRE WAR was all lies


I pray for our troops to return home safely to their families. I pray for those who have lost a loved one in this unjust war and those who have been wounded. We Democrats tried to return you and end this war but republican extremist said " NO WAY!"

Answer 1

What they should do is impeach Bush, remove him from office and bring our troops home. My God, they put Clinton on trial for lying about a BJ. which killed no one. I pray they have the backbone to override his veto. I can't believe all these pro-Bushies on here. Don't they read? Don't they know what Bush's ratings are? Don't they care?

Answer 2

While I agree that the Republicans made some massive mistakes and didn't really plan for the post war, cutting off funding would be extremely DANGEROUS. Bush will not allow troops to leave Iraq until he declares the occupation's mission "accomplished". Which means they'll be there until January 1, 2009 (when the next President takes office, and depending on who wins the 2008 election they could be there longer). The soldiers and marines in Iraq are not there to defend the Republican Party and many of them may not be Republicans themselves. Our military is there to defend America, Republicans and Democrats. Since Bush won't bring them home, cutting off their funding will be playing a very deadly game of politics, and it won't the politicians at home who are dying.

Answer 3

the main serious techniques that the folk can try against international warming is getting rid of their older variety vehicles (1979 Buick) simply by fact, older vehicles emmitt greater poisonous fumes into the air. Its obtrusive that the greater technological progressed a automobile is, the fewer risky gases it emmitts. A automobile that replaced into geared up 3 or 4 years in the past would be greater economic equipment friendly than a automobile that replaced into assembled 35 years in the past. for top populated cities inclusive of ny, Bus and Taxi companys would desire to replace contemporary automobiles with vehicles that are powered via hydrogen or electrical energy. purely think of, if each significant city used the Toyota Prius as taxi's, there would be a decreased point of pollution, and additionally taxi fares would desire to be substantially decrease to boot.

Answer 4

The clown look fits you.

If we pull up of Iraq just what happens to Iraq and the men that have been on our side and want to save their land as well as their women and their kids . Do we just dig graves for them.

How about Darfur ,Sudan ,Afghanistan, Indonesia,Pakistan and India. The war is all over the world if we stop in Iraq the fighting just will get worse in other places.

The Dems have just put a knife in the back of our solders. But again this is what they think "a dead US solder is a Good Solder"

Answer 5

I don't think the soldiers want to be out there without supplies and I don't think they want to return to their families until their mission is done.

Bush knows better than anybody on YA what's really going on.

Answer 6

If we cut the monetary spending too quickly and too much he'll have the troops fighting naked with spears and bows.

Answer 7

Someone needs to beep your nose, clear your brain out.

Answer 8

...if anything its the liberal ideology that "hates" the troops.