Do you think he's peaked and that he really can't get can't change his game anymore to win another Slam or do you think the best is yet to come?
2007-05-01 16:13:44 · 18 answers · asked by rosesandrainydays 2 in Sports ➔ Tennis
Andy will win another Grand Slam, if Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Gonzales and Murray are not around. In other words, there is a poor chance for Roddick to lift a Slam trophy. But, there are other tournaments . . .
2007-05-01 23:09:46 · answer #1 · answered by andrew sts 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless Federer is upset early, I doubt Roddick will win another Grand Slam... there is always a chance, though, especially since he is able to take sets off of Roger. However, in my opinion, he has more of a chance with the Sony Ericsson or other Masters tournaments.
I also don't think he peaked with Gilbert. Under Connors' coaching, Andy has improved so much and upped his game - the only problem is, so have Roger and Rafa! Gilbert started Andy on the right path, and now Connors is taking it a step - a very large step - further.
2007-05-01 17:42:40 · answer #2 · answered by Winner4600 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Roddick will win another Grand Slam. I figure he would have won 5 or 6 Grand Slams if Federer wasn't playing. This is a perfect time for him to win a Grand Slam.He's playing well and he is slowing becoming a complete player. In fact I favor him to win Wimbledon or the US Open. Why? Because he has gotten the one thing that he needs to go all the way. CONFIDENCE AND BELIEF
2007-05-01 18:22:22 · answer #3 · answered by Bri C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think his game is going to be much better or more dynamic than we're seeing this year, but it's perfectly within reason that he could win one or two more slams. If Roger Federer gets injured during the clay court season this year, who is the clear-cut Wimbledon favorite? Roddick. If Roger Federer can't play the U.S. Open this year, same question. Same answer. The faster surfaces really work to Andy's favor. He'd probably have 4 Slams already but he keeps having to play Roger in finals. All it takes is one little injury or one big upset and Andy's in the driver's seat. Don't count him out yet.
2007-05-02 06:34:43 · answer #4 · answered by kowtow21 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think the best is yet to come, but I believe he could win another slam. He is very good still.
2007-05-01 16:17:24 · answer #5 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Andy Roddick has a busy year ahead.
He has recovered from his recent injuries and looking to build on seven years of stellar results on the court.
He's on a roll..
I won;t be shocked if he wins the US open!
2007-05-01 21:25:46 · answer #6 · answered by cutting_edge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i believe he has peeked a bit, but he's going to have a hard time winning another grand slam. i mean hes good, but nadal and fed. are just so much better. if he does, he'll have to be lucky because he's going to have to wait 'till both fed. and nadal are injured.
2007-05-01 16:23:00 · answer #7 · answered by nk_121 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not me
2017-02-12 09:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by Steven C 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've said it once and I'll say it again, "Overrated", I wish he wasn't, cause I support my American tennis players, but he always seems to choke when it counts the most. Oh yeah, and then there's a guy named Roger Federer.
2007-05-01 16:29:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depend when he plays Federer and Nadal. f he doesn't play them until the finals and semi's, he may be on a role and be able to beat them.
2007-05-02 04:18:51 · answer #10 · answered by soxx09 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋