Some of them didn't make it because when they yelled out brains they thought they heard rain and ran for cover.
2007-05-01 15:00:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Humans did not descend from monkeys or apes. We share a common ancestor with these other primates. To make an analogy, consider the trunk of a tree and the branches that grow from it. Each branch can sprout other smaller branches and so on and so forth. The trunk represents the common ancestor while the very tips of the branches represent modern day animals who have descended from it. All branches connecting the trunk to the tips of the smallest branches represent extinct ancestors who were pathways for the rise of the modern existing creatures. Monkeys represent a tip of a small branch while humans are another tip of a different branch of the same tree. The ancestor is neither monkey nor human. More importantly, it is impossible for a modern-day monkey to become human even after millions of years because its evolution has taken a very different path from ours. Its previous recent ancestors paved the way for it to be more "monkey-like". In the same way our previous ancestors paved the way for us to be "human-like".The common ancestor we share has been extinct long ago but its descendants took different evolutionary paths to give rise to the different primate species today. So again, humans did not descend from monkeys nor from apes, rather we all share a long-extinct ancestor which was neither human nor monkey.
2007-05-01 15:00:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andrei 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
...Because evolution of a species does not magically cause all other members of that species to suddenly die?? Evolution is not like Pokemon, first of all. An individual does not suddenly "change" into another individual. Instead, one trait or another slowly appears through BABIES. So if X is going to evolve into Y, and the species is literally changing right in this instant, then parents X1 and X2 may have a Y baby, parents X3 and X4 will have an X baby, and some parents will have something in-between. Species X does not magically disappear off the face of the Earth just because species Y now also exists. Species also exist in many different societies on the Earth. In species we can currently observe, there are a species of Random Animal at the grand canyon which has begun eating Random Desert Food and has a new function of their liver that is not seen in any others of the exact same species anywhere else in the world. First this species started trying out Random Desert Food, then their livers changed to make this food digestible, and now the majority of the species IN THAT LOCATION ONLY has this new type of liver... but not one of the species elsewhere has it, because they never tried out that food. If eventually the Grand Canyon Random Animal also has significant changes in the paws/hands/arms, face, and reproductive organs, they may become a new species. And the new species may include everyone in the Grand Canyon Random Animal society, or it may include only some members who may or may not then migrate to a new area (if not, the new species will live together with the old one). However, even if it WERE like Pokemon, there are still thousands of Eevee running around, and the existence of Umbra does not change this.
Also, humans did not evolve from monkeys. We evolved from apes. Apes are things like gorillas and chimps. Monkeys are the smaller ones that may be kept as pets on your shoulder. Humans' closest existing relatives and chimpanzees and orangutans. Neanderthals existed at the same time as humans. They later became extinct, but they did not become extinct immediately just because humans exist. (As far as I am aware, it is not known for sure whether Neanderthals were a precursor to humans or just another species which existed separately at the same time.) There are also traits in some humans and not others today, which suggest that some humans have evolved further. For example, resistance to certain diseases, based on the actual genes, which is very common in one population and nearly non-existent in another. Another example is skin color. Some humans evolved different skin colors to adapt to their climate, because dark skin (as humans originally had) blocks out sunlight and gives UV protection, so humans living in colder climates experienced a change in their skin color so that they could absorb more warmth and more Vitamin D from the sun.
2016-01-18 07:41:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Raven 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chimpanzees and humans share 98% of the same DNA. This is not my opinion, this is scienfitic fact.
Somewhere along the lines, a branch of chimps fanned out, and due to environmental factors and natural mutation of genes, started to become pi-pedal and walk upright, develop a larger brain, etc.
The rest did not evolve for a variety of reasons and still remain the chimps that we see today.
Intelligent design is not remotely intelligent in nature, and could be the biggest example of an oxymoron known to man. The Bible is full of lies, exaggerations, and stories. It's not fact, not based upon fact, and never will be considered fact no matter how much the thumpers would like to think so.
2007-05-05 03:14:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Josh 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
have you ever tried to race by the treetops of the rainforest? i'm guessing not, yet in case you had, allow me inform you something: you'd be fully garbage at it. Chimpanzees, on the different hand, are amazingly solid at such issues as that. in shown reality that even as we were given extra garbage at tree hiking (because we lived on the African plains the position there have been fewer timber) we mandatory an side, which got here contained in the variety of being fairly smart. each little thing else, like our cool palms and opposable thumbs, walking upright, come from that cleverness and the favor to really observe it. Chimps, in the period in-between, our closest residing cousins, are somewhat nicely adapted to residing contained in the timber. They *have* adapted to their environments, yet as their ecosystem is diverse to ours, they have advanced in a special way. it really is a person-pleasant question requested through Creationists, "why are there nonetheless monkeys", and that i imagine the reason being because we've a tendency to imagine of evolution as a ladder with us on the proper: we are perfect, why are not all the different animals like us? besides the indisputable fact that the reality is in case you want to stay in a tree, then we are a thoughts from the perfect. all the animals are adapted to the ambience in which they stay, filling a particular area of interest. There are nonetheless monkeys because the monkeys that moved to the plains, our ancestors, had to conquer diverse challanges to human beings that stayed contained in the forests, so we went in 2 diverse guidelines. that is that ordinary. An anlogy might want to be if a farmer took the smallest cows he has and breeds them mutually, then the smallest of their offspring and breeds them mutually, etc, finally he will land up with a species of fairly fairly small cow. besides the indisputable fact that the unique herd hasn't lengthy gone everywhere, that is nonetheless the time-honored cows doing the time-honored element. interior the same way, human beings branched off from what we'd want to call a monkey,yet monkeys stay. in this celebration that is synthetic, really than organic determination at artwork, besides the indisputable fact that the outcome is an similar. don't be like Creationists. See mutually with your human being eyes all the cool stuff we've realized about the international. Ask questions, and, importantly, pay interest to the solutions. there is an finished galaxy of fairly interesting stuff and if there's a god, i don't think of he'd favor you to close your eyes to the info about what he's performed or how he's performed it, might want to he?
2016-12-05 05:04:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Over the history of the Earth, there have been many different hominid species. The Homo Sapien is the only species that survives today just as there area number of primate species which do not live today due to evolution or natural selection.
While we share some distant ancestry, humans and apes are different creatures which evolved seperately.
2007-05-01 14:41:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by ©2009 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Still trying to make a better breed of humans? Just kidding.
Your question IS the snag in the theory that man is descended from the monkeys, or the apes, for that matter.
2007-05-01 14:38:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by JADE 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
They are like different branches on the same tree- the tree of life. The monkeys are closer to the begining of the branch and we are the tip.... (this is a rough metaphor)
Anyway... when you breed a dog from a wolf, do wolves dissapear or die out? no.
2007-05-01 14:41:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The ignorance contained in many of these answers is stunning. I am absolutely amazed that so many people still think we were "created" and that monkeys were "created" too. How did people so ignorant of the world ever learn to operate a computer?
Yet further proof that intelligence/education and literal translation of the bible are diametric.
2007-05-01 16:47:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Peter D 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why do people think they are so clever when they ask this question?
Simply because one species evolves from another, does not mean that the first species must go extinct.
Evolution and extinction are, for the most part, unrelated.
That's like asking "if my grocery store started selling Coke, then why is it still selling Pepsi?"
2007-05-01 15:55:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by markwedloe 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Human's didn't decent from monkeys. Humans and monkeys have a common ancestor.
2007-05-01 14:35:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Roman Soldier 5
·
3⤊
1⤋