without a doubt
yeah jesus was a liberal! he wants you to kill your babies, smoke pot and have sex with homosexuals.
I missed that verse
2007-05-01 14:22:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
8⤋
1.) The bible is a mythical, scattered rant.
2.) Just asking a question like this shows YOUR mental disorder: The inability to think for yourself.
(i.e. "programming")
3.) Liberal is a positive word and not a negative as bent by angry, unintelligent puppets.
4.) I think YOU should try "thinking" instead of parroting a negative, untrue mantra.
I hope the words I wrote weren't too big for you.
2007-05-02 03:01:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think there are extemists on both ends of the political (and religious) spectrum that could benefit from counseling or even medication in the most severe cases. But I think it a foolish overgeneralization to characterize all the members of any group of people as being "mental". Excesses from both sides, liberal and conservative, cause problems for all.
2007-05-01 14:31:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. I have seen this question about a dozen times in the past few days. Echolalia IS a mental disorder
"Echolalia is the repetition of vocalizations made by another person. A 1983 report indicated that up to 75% of verbal people with autism have some form of echolalia,[1] but it may also be present in Tourette syndrome, developmental disability, schizophrenia and, occasionally, other forms of psychopathology. When done involuntarily, it is considered a tic".
2007-05-01 14:32:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
this is not any longer a psychological affliction, it incredibly is a controversy of bewilderment that's the end results of a very good kind of obfuscation by using activists who attempt to conceal at the back of labels to avert revealing their genuine intentions. case in point, you have a badly perplexed definition of your perspectives. right this is why. The words Left and precise have a diverse definition in Europe than in usa. the american kind is this: think of an prolonged flat line. interior the middle, place a dot and label it "reasonable". Now moving to the Left you will discover Liberal/innovative, then Socialist and ultimately on the intense Left you will discover Totalitarianism or finished government administration. commencing returned interior the middle returned and moving precise you detect Conservative, then Libertarian and ultimately on the intense precise you detect Anarchy or no government in any respect. so which you're incorrect to evaluate your self a Libertarian/Liberal. that may not possible. What you're describing is plenty extra like center-precise or what's usually mentioned as "reasonable". in spite of the undeniable fact that reasonable and Centrist can span a community from Liberal to Conservative or as we Conservatives oftentimes confer with it, as neither right here nor there. the reason at the back of our disdain for one among those place is that it incredibly is illogical and unworkable. case in point, your desire to have "the two government-funded hospitals that handle human beings for gratis, and that i additionally think of there could be deepest hospitals." that may not attainable. deepest hospitals won't be able to compete with government funded hospitals because of the fact government funded hospitals do no longer care approximately expenses and don't might desire to make a income. in the event that they want funds they only pass to the often used public trough and take it. There incredibly isn't "government funded" something. the deepest sector will pay for it by taxes. Your kind might have deepest corporation competing with publicly funded corporation with the deepest corporation investment the two. would not artwork. Drives expenses up, provider down. *
2017-01-09 07:04:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by eastridge 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to disagree. Our country was founded on the basic principals of free speech, religious freedom and the right to bear arms. Just because both sides take turns shoving their views down each other's throats doesn't make that less of a fact. Both liberals and conservatives need to take a step back and look what they are doing, where it is going, and re-evaluate a lot of their standards.
2007-05-01 14:24:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by liebedich85 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
It appears that someone has been listening to "The Savage Nation" talk show on AM radio. The host of the show Michael Savage has a book out by the name of "Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder".
I believe the statement to be true regarding many things especially regarding abortion and gay marriage. For the most part the liberals have gone to far. They seem to confuse free speech with accepting responsibility for one's words. A person may have the right to call me an S........., but he shouldn't cry when I give him a verbal pie in the face.
2007-05-01 14:37:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kenneth L 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
I believe that fanaticism is a mental disorder, one you may be afflicted with, seek help.
Soooooo, liberals started the war, liberals are in bed with big oil, and liberals have been in control for the last two administrationes. Ooooh wait you meant Republicans!
hey, I'm a Republican, I wish idiots like you would stop continuing to soil our party. Having Bush and co. is bad enough. Here's an idea. Stop being a narrowminded blowhard. Then you'd have less problems.
2007-05-01 14:26:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by 47 3
·
4⤊
4⤋
Ah, the rantings of a conservative lunatic.
Oh yes, we all should take your word as perfect knowledge. I think that too many people telling others how to live is a big problem with society today.
2007-05-01 15:03:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
No, I believe the mental disorder is called Christianity!
2007-05-01 14:27:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by perrrfection 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
definitely...I don't know how anyone could keep spouting the batch of garbage liberals do unless they were mentally challenged in some way or another.
2007-05-01 14:26:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sandy T 2
·
4⤊
2⤋