Anyone else tired of the 9/11 Iraq connectction garbage by the democrats?

Question

When we went to Iraq, the Bush administration did not say "Iraq is connected to 9/11. They said that terrorist groups were in Iraq, suchas Al Qaeda, and that they were a threat to the U.S. They never said that "Iraq is responsible for 9/11." No. They said Iraq is a threat to our security, they stated what they beleive to be correct intelligence, and Congress, the very people who are blaming Bush for this war, voted to declare war. Im ired of people saying that Bush lied, when he found out the truth, he was the first to tell you! He didn't lie! Clinton says: "Knowing what I know now, i wouldn't have gone to war in 2003. " Well isn't that convenient! All we need is a time machine! And don't get me started on this bill to withdraw troops! AHHHHH

Answer 1

it is so sad to see the demwits attempts to rewrite history and even more so, to see the long term memory lapses of their devotees. these aren't celebrities or, screenwriters we're talking about though their followers would have us believe otherwise thus, believe in their imaginary tales. their just as responsible for their actions as the pres though for some reason, they like to think they could never bear any culpability.

i really fear for our future if their grasp for the oval office takes hold. all i can do is try and focus upon the here and now, knowing we have a more responsible man in the whitehouse for the time being.

where or, when the followers of the democratic party lost their abilities to reason and for logic, i'll never know.

God bless our president and the Republican party.......

EDIT: yes, i am sickened and tired of the artistic liberties the democrats feel entitled to take whenever they are issuing their endless babbling and constant complaints.

Answer 2

Bush administration specifically claimed Saddam's regime had direct contact with Al Qaeda members, provided training...etc. Technically I would say he didn't lie since there were intels at the time(later disputed, proved fabricated). But, what the administration have done, making WMD case, highly depended on just single source, 'Curveball' mounts very close to a lie. There was real efforts to inflate credibility of WMD evidence. Rational for such act is that if there is 1% chance that Saddam had nukes we must treat it as though it is 100%. That's the way Cheney sees it.

There were information before 2003, that said Saddam had WMD, but there were also information that said those WMD evidences are either not true or fabricated. All these information existed when the Bush administration said Saddam had WMD(without a doubt). While this technically may not be a lie, but it's very misleading.

It is equivalent to drug company marketing a miracle drug, but failing to disclose nasty side effects or the fact that it has not been yet approved.

Obviously democrats calling Bush a liar is politics as usual, but they're not that far off.

Answer 3

I am very tired of it. I cannot stand to watch the evening news anymore. It is not news, it is mostly liberal propaganda, at least on the issue of the war. The Dems are trying to rewrite history to make themselves look better and the media is giving them a platform to do it.