Do you think "your" will ever replace "you're"?

Question

Teenagers and uneducated people seem to always use "your" instead of "you're" (especially here on Answers). Do you think that soon enough everyone will start using it, kind of like how "lol" and other internet phrases are now used in advertisments?

Answer 1

Not if I'm doing the correcting.

Answer 2

Good grief, I hope not. I'm tired of the dumbing down of America. People should stop bringing others down to their level (of incompetency.) I believe the king's English should be taught, learned and expected. For crying out loud, we have spell/grammar check. Could we get any lazier?

Now, I hope I didn't make any mistakes!

Answer 3

it might be accepted as a form of internet/text shortened language but I don't think the grammar world/schools will ever let it go. Because "You're" is a contraction, it actually means "You Are" whereas Your shows possession. People are just dumb...the other one that bothers me is there, their, and they're.

Answer 4

No.

Despite the fact that both refer to you. Both mean something else entirely.

Your refers to something you own, whilst
You're refers to something about you....it is short for you are.

I am sure you already knew about this, but if people are using your instead of you're then they must be unaware of this rule. Either that or they are just lazy.

Answer 5

Well, there does seem to be evidence that we'll drop the apostrophe in uses of possession, as these are easily identified by the context of the surround sentence, but as you're means you are, and your means something that you own, it's quite unlikely we'll let this one drop.

Answer 6

Is it ok if i use Youre instead of You're over the internet?

Answer 7

Educated people will still use you're because it stands for "you are" and your as in "your house". Just because lazy people, instant and text messaging and vanity words are used (like Doggie Dooz), proper English will still be our language.

Answer 8

immediately adult males will call some adult males good-looking in the experience that they in good structure societies definition of the perfect male body.yet you ought to keep in mind that adult males dont imagine adult males are the added efficient searching than females through any stretch like females imagine women idealize attractiveness. females frequently say looking a member of the same sex aesthetically pleasant doesn’t lead them to gay, and it really is real. as a be counted of reality, i believe absolutely everyone who hates his/her sex adequate to judge his/her gender’s body intrinsically gruesome has topics. yet, the archetypical woman doesn’t provide up there, she also says “females are extra pleasing than adult males” and this time issues are very diverse. even as comparing adult males to women, they are judging an emblem (“attractiveness”) interior of a dichotomous format; it has not something to do with looking one’s sex aesthetically pleasant or not (a case we already uncovered), this time it really is about a “equipped in” (yet moderated through society) bigotry which will render one sex’s actual features extra pleasing than the different’s. this example for sure contains sexual orientation because the products will be evaluated in accordance to sexual attributes; and considering that both sexes are literally not equivalent, the outcome won't be able to be something yet a Boolean (both male features render the male sex extra efficient searching or woman features render females extra efficient searching, someone who says they are both pleasing is mendacity considering that we initiate from the theory of thinking both sexes visually diverse and someone who says they are diverse is merely eluding the evaluation even as pointing out the obtrusive). maximum females are lesbian (they discover the female body extra aesthetically pleasant , they prefer to seem at females, etc.) leaning bisexuals (they provide the effect of being for vendors, see sex as a job, etc) through nature; i do not get why everyone is so reluctant to settle for this reality. I recommend, that is not often a revelation.

Answer 9

I HOPE not!! Sad isn't it? Actually, ur will replace both of them. :( Do you think comma splices will one day be accepted English? (See the first answer to this question for an example of a comma splice.)

Answer 10

No. Education lasts a lifetime! Including yours! I think you're smart.

Answer 11

I hope not b/c I think people would get confused. It's like trying to merge "there, their, and they're" together. Just b/c people use the wrong one doesn't mean we should change the language to suit them.