English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Actually they did help. They toppled the Nazi regime, which saved the surviving victims. The allies made a calculated decision to defeat the regime instead of focusing on rescuing the concentration camp prisoners. Right or wrong this was the decision they reached.

2007-05-01 12:26:21 · answer #1 · answered by totamed 3 · 0 0

I recommend that the better decrease for contributions be completed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social secure practices isn't a "supply away" software yet one which all of us make contributions to love a fee reductions plan, and could be secure against different makes use of by using the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so worried approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it returned into the deepest sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own activity, 2d pay returned each penny you have borrowed from the two Social secure practices and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet in no way paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the comparable for anybody; in different words government officers are to take area in it and in the event that they want something extra they do it on their very own with out the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been incredibly replaced. They, a team of scholars, mentioned that each physique expenses of activity may well be 3% or much less for anybody to grow to be wealthy if needed (that could desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the final financial problem may well be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no expenses of activity. Why no longer attempt this answer? the wealthy might nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial secure practices will become a difficulty linked to federal expenses, why no longer artwork with a balanced or benefit funds and spend no extra advantageous than is supplied in, as any kinfolk has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents as a manner to get rules that serve the rustic? God bless usa.

2017-01-09 06:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by kunich 4 · 0 0

Because there was no holocaust. It was fabricated out of whole cloth after WWII to generate sympathy for Jews. Actually there were genuine holocausts - Millions of Russian gentiles were slaughtered by the Jewish Bolsheviks during the communistic reign of terror. Also, the Jewish Bolsheviks starved six million Ukranians to death. The Japanese murdered close to 2.5 million Koreans. There were no other holocausts.

2007-05-01 13:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Misanthrope 2 · 0 0

Why doesnt the US help in the Sudan? Because we dont involve ourselves in every genocide I guess. We did nothing about the Kurds after the Gulf War. Sad but true. The US got involved when its interests were being threatened...when Japan attacked...when Hitler was taking over Europe, perhaps a little late on that count.

2007-05-01 12:26:25 · answer #4 · answered by birdie 6 · 0 0

for the exact same reason and problem we have now. liiberal extremists in congress. in the forties ethnic cleansing was known about in europe as it was in iraq with the kurds. the problem is, until 1941 the post recession economy was good and isolationists (as pelosi/and reid) felt, why screw with success. Neville Chamberlain from Britian even went to the point of giving the germans what they wanted in exchange for leaving london alone (similar to Pelosi and syria). Ultimately merhchant ships were bombed by u boats and finally pearl harbor got us into the war, but the sad part of it now is the liberal extremists for some reason cant see the parallel. lets hope they wake up before its too late.

2007-05-01 12:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 0

U mean help the Nazis or the Jews? Because they helped the victims of the Holoucast if that's what you mean. They came in with tanks and everything.

2007-05-01 12:24:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well, my grandfather was part of the troops that helped liberate Germany from the Nazi's, so I'm not sure about the "didn't help" thing.

2007-05-01 12:24:55 · answer #7 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 0 0

the us did help in the holocaust

go here and it has a time line thingy w/ all the info about the holocaust and WW2
http://www.multied.com/ww2/index.html

2007-05-01 12:26:06 · answer #8 · answered by trackstarx2010 1 · 0 0

We weren't very well-informed at first, then when we stepped in it was already in full swing. BTW, now that we're helping in Iraq everyone is opposed.........maybe we were afraid of having that same reaction (you know, that we should mind our own business)

2007-05-01 12:24:19 · answer #9 · answered by Elizabeth L 5 · 1 0

We didn't know that it was going on. We were focused on our problems and didn't realize something so terrible was going on. It's amazing how Hitler kept everything so hush hush.

2007-05-01 12:58:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers