Harry Reid does it again! Will a skewed sense of reality stop him this time? Remember he's supposed to lead!

Question

exact quote, again to forestall liberal whining
"Reality on the ground proves what we all know: A change of course is needed."

If, again according to harry(exact quote) weve already failed, as he exclamed in front of a banner that said support our troops(lmfao) wouldnt the change of course needed be to put a cork in it and allow people who understand al qaeda to do thier jobs without any more liberal extremist interference?
Ever notice that his "sense" of reality has never indicated any specific reasoning for an Oct. 1 withdrawl date-vs-any other date. Has he, or anyone else in the pelosi/reid regime(fat chance) considered that al qaeda could care less what date these cowards want to cut and run and the reality check is they will have wasted the best effort of these soldiers work to preseve the freedoms there and ultimately plunge the area into complete chaos?
And finally considering declaration of failure and pork inclusion in the next bill isnt the result just more tax+spend?

Wow liberals think, SHOCK SUPRISE... LET ME SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU MARINA OK..THEN YOU WILL UNDERSTAND.
1. BULL..if you think al qaeda had no involvement in iraq, you have more serious issues than this war. al qaeda is global...911 proved that. saddam was in open defiance of the un and ethnicly cleansing the kurds..remember aucshwitz, dachau?? the kurds are no different and are greatful for the us..without us theyd all be dead.
2. Frankly who gives a rats rear if Osama was there or not. The middle east doesnt begin or end with Osama and unless responsible conservatives stop you and harry it will be plunged into chaos soon enough by you. as stated previously, the blood is on your hands.
3.BULL the missle trackers were found the casings were found and they had plenty of time to move them...check R. Butlers un report not the pelosi press release.
4. Reality is today, al qaeda is today. deal with it, we are.
5. Oops, you mean Harry was wrong??? LMFAO. he thought it was over

Answer 1

Have you ever noticed that Harry Reid and Company never talk about what the consequences are of the surrender that they're suggesting? If you listen to Reid, Murtha, Pelosi and Company, you'd think we could just take our ball and go home and everything will be fine.

Answer 2

Another Harry Reid flip flop. I think a woman in PMS might have a better mind than him. I believe Fox News Channel did a feature on this man which i dont think they shouldnt have wasted their time. But then again Didnt Harry Reid come from the same planet as Pelosi. The world of pot-smokers in cali and nevada.

Answer 3

I really don't get how your reasoning works. There seems to be an "off" switch in your brain that avoids all the BIG points:

I will try to make it very clear so maybe these points will somehow get to that dense part of your brain:

1. Initially there was no Al Queda in Iraq
2. There was no Osama Bin Laden in Iraq
3. There were no WMDs in Iraq
4. Hussain not responsible for 9/11 Osama responsible
5. Soldiers are fighting in Iraq

Obviously in your backward way of thinking, this all makes sense to you and our reasons for fighting in Iraq.

Answer 4

someone has to tell it the way it is.