2007-05-01 09:29:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I think I am trying to get out of three dimentional thinking and thinking of the fourth dimention of time in the equation.
2007-05-01 09:56:14 · update #1
Yes I know about E=mc (squared) which has the speed of light factored into which could be considered a componet of time
2007-05-01 09:57:21 · update #2
I was trying to convey the idea that the occupation of space is simply the mass of something and the time in which it was there. So I guess I just thinking too much.
2007-05-01 09:59:12 · update #3
You can not measure "Space" as it is believed as infinate, however the occupation of Space can be finite.
2007-05-01 12:02:54 · update #4
That is really a tough question. In relation to your location in space and time, you can think of the location of a mass as being defined by three coordinates in space and one in time. Mass causes space to curve over time, but I don't think you can say mass + time = space. I have often thought that mass, energy, time, and space are all different aspects of the same reality, as if they were all the same thing before the big bang, but became separated during the big bang.
A tough question to answer!
2007-05-01 18:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by steve b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I can agree with you that some original thinking is refreshing from time to time, but, adding mass and time will benefit no one. You wind up with a poundminute, or a kilogramsec...which is like lead and light...no washee.
If you want to do some original thinking, let me suggest the calculation of total carbon dioxide consumed by a given plant per day/week/month.
Make a chart by plant species which should include all locally available evergreen shrubs.
This chart would be hugely welcomed by the GREEN Folks in our society who don't seem to have the time to produce one themselves. A well developed and proven chart should retail at around $ 9.95 U.S. each. Think about it. Not hard to do if you set up the equipment and take the time to make the measurements. Could this be the fixit required for Global Warming?
2007-05-01 17:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cut Little Dude some slack.
It's an original question. Very refreshing.
Play with it. Come up with units that define Space. Excellent.
E = mc2
m= c2/E
c2/E + t = S
c2/E = S- t
1/E = S - t / c2
E = c2 / S - t
So energy is inversely proportional to Space minus Time.
At T= 0, E = c2/S, energy is minimal for real space.
As time increases, Space gets smaller and energy increases.
2007-05-01 17:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Lorenzo Steed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no equation such as this. How in the world can you add Mass and time???? e=mc2 is the amount of energy in an object. it is something you can measure. Space is not!!
2007-05-01 18:27:24 · answer #4 · answered by martinpaul2001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever you want them to be. Adding Mass and time doesn't make sense. What is 1 kg + 1 hour? Is it 1 meter? Does not compute.
2007-05-01 16:34:53 · answer #5 · answered by morningfoxnorth 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The yellow brick road!
2007-05-01 17:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
E=mc2!
the only energy equation
unless you talk about potential energy, kinetic energy, etc
2007-05-01 16:37:30 · answer #7 · answered by cokittedelarge 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋