it wouldn't be a loss, because it's a g**damn civil war and we have no freaking business there in the first place. it would be like the catholics and the methodists here having a war against each other and the iraqi army coming over here to keep peace. doesn't make much f***ing sense, does it? i say imopeach the bastard now and don't allow him to finish his term. he workls for us, dammit!
2007-05-01 09:22:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Bush is responsible for everything that has ever happened anywhere. Katrina, 9/11, The snow in New England, the plight of the wild tiger, Mr. Ed's death, the formula change in Pepsi, my cats demise in 86....everything.
Have some more kool-aid sir!
2007-05-01 09:39:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by stepped on the Third Rail 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The question presumes there's some similarity between the irresponsible and the non-responsible. Fuggedaboudit.
2007-05-01 09:44:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Grist 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I previously just thought he was irresponsible but if he intentionally lied to Congress and the American people to lure them into war, he should be Impeached, any time.
2007-05-01 09:35:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In 2009, the party in power will take the fault for another hit in America
2007-05-01 09:38:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
He leaves on January 20, 2009. Indeed a happy day.
2007-05-01 09:21:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
He'll always be held responsible, as he started it!
2007-05-01 09:24:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Drink, purple kool aid, We cant hold him Responsible,
Don't forget Congress had to Authorize it First. But they seem to have Amnesia.
2007-05-01 09:22:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
a little over a year.
2007-05-01 10:03:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by acid tongue 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
We say bye bye on Jan 20,2009
2007-05-01 09:22:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
1⤊
1⤋