...in spite of the fact that the document was an obvious forgery? Oh wait, they already did that. Nevermind.
2007-05-01 08:41:16 · 7 answers · asked by Lavrenti Beria 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Is "youtube" where libs get their news from now? No wonder they're so pathetic.
2007-05-01 08:51:15 · update #1
You know what would be great? Let Sandy Berger come on ,pull the doc out of his draws and hand it to Dan Blather to read.
2007-05-01 08:48:53 · answer #1 · answered by Let 'em Eat Cankles 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe.
If it was blatently false, they wouldn't run it, but I'm not so sure they would go out of their way to test a document that made a Republican look bad.
But if you had a document that made a Dem look bad, they would check it out left, right, up & down, hoping to find something to disprove it. Or they would just ignore it claiming it wasn't really news-worthy.
* EDIT * The National Guard documents were NOT an "obvious" forgery. But they didn't work to hard to check it out, did they?
2007-05-01 15:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you gave them a copy and not the original. Would you come back in 3 months and say "That is not a document that's a COPY"
Go Team Red Go
2007-05-01 16:15:15 · answer #3 · answered by ShortBus43 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What kind of right wing rambling is that? The ran the story about the document itself as the forgery it was.Duh.
Lemme guess, you think Faux "news" is fair and balanced.
2007-05-01 15:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by Jim W 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
And Fox who tells a lie a second!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZpltRY0eIw&mode=related&search=
2007-05-01 15:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I like how you flame an entire television company because of one of their programs. Shows higher level thought processes
2007-05-01 15:45:03 · answer #6 · answered by hyungbinkim 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
don henley had a song "Dirty laundry" it should be their new theme.
2007-05-01 15:53:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋