President Hugo Chavez's government took over Venezuela's last privately run oil fields Tuesday, intensifying a struggle with international firms over the development of the world's largest known petroleum deposit.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3104692
2007-05-01 06:57:29 · 18 answers · asked by NONAME 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They love him and everyone who is out to hurt America.Seeing the USA fail is their common goal.
2007-05-01 07:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
I am neither a Democrat nor am I a Reuplican. I believe in the Constitution and the ideals set forth by our founding fathers. I guess that would consititute me being an American. I think most Americans get caught up in this unholy dialectic that George Washington warned us against; that political parities are the bane of our existance.
Regarding Chavez, does the Venezuelan people have any choices other than the dialectic that they are ensnared in? Is their government a representative one? It is up to the Venezuelan people to have any form of government they so choose. This would be in adherence to the "Treaty of Westphalia" in 1648. I am very dubious of Chavez because his power is rooted in despotism. Even though I agree with some of Chavez's policies against American hegymony, his motives must be questioned on the basis and the influence of the Roman Catholic Church's position toward a centralized government. Hence, the Treaty of Westphalia that gave each nation the right to govern itself wthout interference from the church. Chavez will never act out against the church. Chavez fits neatly into the Hegelian dialectic of problem versus reaction equals solution. I beseech you to be leery of this marauder. From all indications this man is a Jesuit of the short robe. Chavez is no different than our longtime nemesis Fidel Castro. Both these leaders do not practice that individuals are sovereign, but are only tools of the state for their own self-aggrandizement.
"He may smile a smile and still be a Villian."
2007-05-01 07:34:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
they simply take heed to their exhibits so they could now not see it. yet right here is your confirmation: "possibly Bush’s call basically isn't dirt any further. The Washington placed up/ABC ballot asked respondents to value Bush’s performance for the 1st time once you communicate approximately that December 2008, while maximum efficient 33 share rated it genuinely and sixty six share rated it negatively. What the pollster chanced on is that at present 40 seven share approve and 50 p.c. disapprove of Bush’s overall performance. That approval quantity is precisely the comparable as Barack Obama’s in possibly the main cutting-edge placed up/ABC ballot." i've got a $one hundred invoice that announces a year from now Bush could have a greater score than Obama.
2016-10-14 06:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the one who made Chavez so popular in Venezuela. Facts are facts. Chavez is a reaction to Republican governance in the U.S. For ever action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Deal with it.
2007-05-01 07:03:02 · answer #4 · answered by Gemini 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chavez, like Milosevic and Lukashenko, were democratically elected, in free and fair elections, without staging "Nazis Vs. Jews" stile propaganda (they didn't-their political opponents did). "Dictator" is not a word describing any "enemy of the US". Nor do these "dictators" despise great US presidents such as Roosevelt and Truman. In fact, it was the grandfather of the current US president who was engaged in illegal business with Hitler's Germany, behind the back of those two wonderful presidents.
2007-05-01 07:09:43 · answer #5 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He is an asshat - anytime a country shuns foreign investment they run the risk of economic failure. Socialistic states at this level borderline communism and we all know how well that works. Has the former Soviet Bloc come out of bankruptcy yet?
2007-05-01 07:01:36 · answer #6 · answered by Joshua B 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess I wish Bush knew how to use diplomacy in order to calm him down a bit. It is scary to have a President who makes enemies all around the world, and Chavez is working to devalue the dollar as he is pushing for oil to be paid for in Euros. Yup, that's my take on it.
2007-05-01 07:01:12 · answer #7 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
First of all, Chavez was elected and bush was not.
2007-05-01 07:05:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am very happy for him. He was elected by the majority of people in his country because they agreed with his vision of the future. Hope it goes well. Hope we never get called to go liberate them!!!
2007-05-01 08:07:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's doing great...Latin-America needs to stop following the U.S. OBVIOUSLY U.S. policies haven't work. Goodluck Hugo for the ppl of Latin-America
2007-05-01 07:00:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why do conservatives like to frame questions?
2007-05-01 07:04:48 · answer #11 · answered by Frank 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋