Was this the WORLD CUP OF TRAGEDIES ?

Question

CAPTAINS&COACHES RESIGNING AND PLAYERS HAVING TRAGIC ENDING TO THEIR CAREERS

Answer 1

yes its a utter failure & Tragedy. And yors is a Good question buddy.There is an answer called him self "burning fury".he is an Australian.
He may give you real funny Answer.
he is one of the spectaters who chanted "no Ball" to Murali when he was balling in Australia.
he is decendents from marooned & ship dropped ausies
from England .now he can cnot hide his vulger attitude.
That's How people like him from their country to
a decent question
i saw him one of the answers saying,dirtiest words in the Language.who is he talking about Sri Lanka?
we dont need him talking SL other than Cricket.
we are proud to be supporters of Sri Lanka.
we love to be there too.but right now i am some where else.
In The final the ball would have been wet and slippery so its harder to grip the ball.& the match was reduced to 38 overs ,
so it would have had a psychological impact too.
there was a battle between LTTE Rebels & Air foce at the
time of the final .
Almost everySL cricket player's parents were
in Capital city.so sinse their parent kids & wives in life & death situation,
how can a human can face such apresure situation?
still umpires supported Australia.
Against all odds Sri Lankan Cricketers did Galent Job .
Even Big teams Like Newzealand.South Africa crumpled against Ausies.
but these Lankans fought a brave Battle against bad
weather , bad Umpiring,
& bad light.
we are proud ma brothers .
hail to thee SL cricketers.!
Lara Inzy Mcgra woolmer,DUNCAN we miss everyone of them
good job to keep sinister world cup alive.
thank you all...

Answer 2

this is the worst tragedy cricket ever encoutered
i doubt this may lead to down fall of cricket enthusiasm in general~may be

I think when "Gill" drank some fluids which
brought by Autralian reserved player,
might have given him this power hitting ability


Gichrist did illegal thing
me think when "Gilcriss drank some fluids which
brought by Autralian reserved player,
might have given him this big hitting power
Law 3 (6) (c) (i) specifically prohibits a player from using equipment other than that permitted. And nowhere in cricket’s 42 laws is there a mention of a squash ball as a permitted item.

sri lanka could have won under better circustances,

if it was a 50 over match
if the weather was better.

this was the only match in the world cup it wasnt 50 overs. they should have postponed it for the next day or a day the weather was good.

Ultimately....rain & light chaos prevented
Sri Lanka from winning the World cup 2007
still some fans demand srilakns
shut their mouth about this UNJUST....
At least these fans ~criss and ~sord rox and lara king~
doing something against this ~disgusting unjust
thanx again guys
we dont worship Kangaroos
we worship .. only god

Answer 3

This had become a one sided world cup,as far as cricket it is not a good sign.
No team is a match to the Great Aussies,the players and coaches who understood this have called it a day,

Answer 4

Considering the early exit of Indian and Pakistan, rain interruptedand truncated matches, lack of excitement in the matches, one sided semi finals and lotofconfusion in the final, death of Bob Woolmerand retirement of some of the leading players etc., the cricket world cup2007 can be termed as an event of tragedies.

Answer 5

Yes,corruption in cricket must now be tackled agressively...
This worldcup is by far the most boring worldcup i have seen..
i am following cricket world cups since 1992...

Answer 6

I don't know much about tragedy...But we can talk about tragedy's if we talk about Umpire's decesion's through out the world cup.Specially in the final.......If Mahela Jayawardana hasn't been given Out by a bad decesion.....we can see Who are the real Champs....

Answer 7

Yes !! can be said !! this was no doubt a very strange world cup !!

Answer 8

yes