English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-01 04:45:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

We could start with Chicago, feel free to add suggested Cities.

2007-05-01 05:02:59 · update #1

Phoneix, Seattle,

2007-05-01 05:35:52 · update #2

7 answers

San Francisco, pull the plug on pelosi the bitc* and that disgusting city.

Oh forget it, I really like the city, it just has a disproportionate amount of fruits and nuts california is famous for.

2007-05-04 14:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

There could desire to be no "funds" going to any city. examine your shape. the federal government is utilising taxpayers funds to bribe cities and states to do the choose of our flesh pressers on the federal point. this could be an prompt violation of the form, that's a criminal offense. while public servants on the federal point use taxpayers funds to bribe public servants on the state and local point, that's to stay clean of the regulations placed on the federal government's authority. for example, withholding "federal funds" from states not implementing a 55 mph speed decrease is a contravention of the form. the federal government has no authority to swap the value decrease of any state. there is not any such subject as federal funds. Tax payer's funds sent to Washington, is to pay for classes authorized by using the form to the federal government. Now you be responsive to why I call them criminal politicians.

2016-10-14 06:26:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because, the Federal Government wants illegal immigration, that's why they don't defend the border, and why thier 'raids' are purely token political actions.

The Federal Government is made up of Democrats who want massive immigration of 'minorities' that they assume will flock to Democratic candidates once they achieve citizenship (or thier american-born kids will when old enough to vote, anyway), and of Republicans who want to provide cheap labor-law-exempt workers to thier corporate masters.

If they could, they'd give sanctuary cities Federal relief of some sort.

2007-05-01 04:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 1

Heck, they don't even need to do that.

Just drop all their requests for money or assistance to the bottom of the list.

2007-05-01 04:48:08 · answer #4 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1 0

Excellent idea. That would work.

2007-05-01 04:51:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Simple...It is all about votes.

2007-05-01 04:48:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They should.

2007-05-01 04:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers